Browse · MathNet
PrintChina Mathematical Olympiad
China number theory
Problem
Suppose a set satisfies the following conditions: (1) every element in is a positive integer and not greater than ; (2) for any two different elements and in , there is an element in such that the greatest common divisor of and is equal to , and the greatest common divisor of and is also ; and (3) for any two different elements and in , there is an element , which is different from and , such that the greatest common divisor of and , and that of and are greater than .
Find the maximum number of elements in .
Find the maximum number of elements in .
Solution
The maximum number of elements is .
A positive integer not greater than can be written as where is a positive integer and not divisible by , , , and , and and are nonnegative integers.
We pick out those positive integers with just one or two nonzero among and to form set . In this case, contains even numbers ( and ) except the following seven: , , , , , and ; odd numbers that are multiples of three (i.e. ), odd numbers with the least prime divisor (i.e. and ), odd numbers with the least prime divisor (i.e. and ), and the prime number .
Consequently, contains numbers totally.
In what follows, we will prove that constructed above satisfies the given condition.
Obviously, it satisfies condition (1).
For condition (2), we note that, at most, four prime divisors among and will occur in . We write the prime which does not occur as . Obviously, and Hence, we take .
For condition (3), we take the least prime divisor of as and the one of as when . It is easy to see that and . Hence , and Being coprime to each other for and ensures that is different from and . Thus we take .
When , we take as the least prime divisor of , and as the smallest prime number satisfying . It is easy to see that , and and . Hence , and ensures that is different from and . Thus, we take .
In what follows, we prove that the number of elements in , which satisfies the conditions described in the problem, will not be greater than .
Obviously, . For arbitrary two prime numbers and which are both greater than , since the least number which is not prime to neither nor is , it must be greater than . So we know, according to condition (3), that there is at most one among prime numbers between and (), occurring in . We write the set consisting of all natural numbers not greater than except and the above-mentioned prime numbers as , and there are numbers in the set. We can conclude that there are at least numbers in are not in . Thus contains at most elements.
i. When a prime number is greater than and belongs to ,
every number in can only have and as its least prime divisor. By condition (2), we have the following conclusions.
① If , because contains all the least prime divisors, we know from condition (2) that and do not belong to . If , noting , but , so from condition (2) we know that and do not belong to .
② If , then and do not belong to . If , then and do not belong to .
③ and do not belong to at the same time.
④ and do not belong to at the same time.
⑤ If , then .
When or , from ①, ②, ③ and ④, we can get at least and numbers in respectively which do not belong to , and in total numbers. When or , from ①, ② and ③, we can get at least and numbers in respectively, which do not belong to and in total numbers. When , from ①, ② and ③, there are at least and numbers in respectively, which do not belong to and in total numbers also.
ii. If there is no prime number greater than belonging to , then the least prime numbers in can only be and . Hence, each of the following pairs of numbers can not belong to at the same time: Thus, there are at least numbers in that are not in .
Consequently, the answer for this problem is .
A positive integer not greater than can be written as where is a positive integer and not divisible by , , , and , and and are nonnegative integers.
We pick out those positive integers with just one or two nonzero among and to form set . In this case, contains even numbers ( and ) except the following seven: , , , , , and ; odd numbers that are multiples of three (i.e. ), odd numbers with the least prime divisor (i.e. and ), odd numbers with the least prime divisor (i.e. and ), and the prime number .
Consequently, contains numbers totally.
In what follows, we will prove that constructed above satisfies the given condition.
Obviously, it satisfies condition (1).
For condition (2), we note that, at most, four prime divisors among and will occur in . We write the prime which does not occur as . Obviously, and Hence, we take .
For condition (3), we take the least prime divisor of as and the one of as when . It is easy to see that and . Hence , and Being coprime to each other for and ensures that is different from and . Thus we take .
When , we take as the least prime divisor of , and as the smallest prime number satisfying . It is easy to see that , and and . Hence , and ensures that is different from and . Thus, we take .
In what follows, we prove that the number of elements in , which satisfies the conditions described in the problem, will not be greater than .
Obviously, . For arbitrary two prime numbers and which are both greater than , since the least number which is not prime to neither nor is , it must be greater than . So we know, according to condition (3), that there is at most one among prime numbers between and (), occurring in . We write the set consisting of all natural numbers not greater than except and the above-mentioned prime numbers as , and there are numbers in the set. We can conclude that there are at least numbers in are not in . Thus contains at most elements.
i. When a prime number is greater than and belongs to ,
every number in can only have and as its least prime divisor. By condition (2), we have the following conclusions.
① If , because contains all the least prime divisors, we know from condition (2) that and do not belong to . If , noting , but , so from condition (2) we know that and do not belong to .
② If , then and do not belong to . If , then and do not belong to .
③ and do not belong to at the same time.
④ and do not belong to at the same time.
⑤ If , then .
When or , from ①, ②, ③ and ④, we can get at least and numbers in respectively which do not belong to , and in total numbers. When or , from ①, ② and ③, we can get at least and numbers in respectively, which do not belong to and in total numbers. When , from ①, ② and ③, there are at least and numbers in respectively, which do not belong to and in total numbers also.
ii. If there is no prime number greater than belonging to , then the least prime numbers in can only be and . Hence, each of the following pairs of numbers can not belong to at the same time: Thus, there are at least numbers in that are not in .
Consequently, the answer for this problem is .
Final answer
72
Techniques
Greatest common divisors (gcd)Prime numbersFactorization techniquesColoring schemes, extremal arguments