Browse · MathNet
PrintInternational Mathematical Olympiad
number theory
Problem
Find all triples of positive integers with prime and
Solution
Solution 1. Clearly, . We consider three cases.
Case 1: We have . Then we either have which implies leading to a contradiction, or which is also impossible since in this case we have , where the last inequality is true for any .
Case 2: We have . In this case so which means that is divisible by . Hence, is divisible by and is not divisible by . This means that . If then divides both and and hence it also divides which is impossible. On the other hand, the case is also impossible since then .
Comment. The inequality can be shown e.g. by using where the inequality comes from applying AM-GM to each of the terms in square brackets.
Case 3: We have . In this case . One can check that the values lead to the claimed solutions and does not lead to a solution. So we now assume that . We have and so which implies that where in the middle we used lifting-the-exponent lemma. On the RHS we have three factors of . But, due to , there are at least 4 even numbers among , so this case is not possible.
Solution 2. The cases are covered as in solution 1, as are . For we have . By Zsigmondy's Theorem there exists some prime that divides but does not divide for . It follows that , and hence . Note that . But then we must have , giving a contradiction.
Solution 3. The cases are covered as in solution 1, as are . Also , as for . The cases are also checked manually, so assume . Let be an odd prime. By LTE But , so then , since , a contradiction. This means that has no odd prime divisor, i.e. for some .
Now let be an odd prime. By LTE Let . Then , so provided and , or . If and then . Either way, . If (so , as ) then so we must have , in other words, . This implies that and are both prime, but it is not possible to have two consecutive Mersenne primes.
Solution 4. Let and (the remaining cases are dealt with as in solution 3). Modulo it holds that Since , the numbers and are distinct and less than or equal to . Therefore, , and so . But , so , a contradiction.
Therefore, the only solutions are and .
Case 1: We have . Then we either have which implies leading to a contradiction, or which is also impossible since in this case we have , where the last inequality is true for any .
Case 2: We have . In this case so which means that is divisible by . Hence, is divisible by and is not divisible by . This means that . If then divides both and and hence it also divides which is impossible. On the other hand, the case is also impossible since then .
Comment. The inequality can be shown e.g. by using where the inequality comes from applying AM-GM to each of the terms in square brackets.
Case 3: We have . In this case . One can check that the values lead to the claimed solutions and does not lead to a solution. So we now assume that . We have and so which implies that where in the middle we used lifting-the-exponent lemma. On the RHS we have three factors of . But, due to , there are at least 4 even numbers among , so this case is not possible.
Solution 2. The cases are covered as in solution 1, as are . For we have . By Zsigmondy's Theorem there exists some prime that divides but does not divide for . It follows that , and hence . Note that . But then we must have , giving a contradiction.
Solution 3. The cases are covered as in solution 1, as are . Also , as for . The cases are also checked manually, so assume . Let be an odd prime. By LTE But , so then , since , a contradiction. This means that has no odd prime divisor, i.e. for some .
Now let be an odd prime. By LTE Let . Then , so provided and , or . If and then . Either way, . If (so , as ) then so we must have , in other words, . This implies that and are both prime, but it is not possible to have two consecutive Mersenne primes.
Solution 4. Let and (the remaining cases are dealt with as in solution 3). Modulo it holds that Since , the numbers and are distinct and less than or equal to . Therefore, , and so . But , so , a contradiction.
Therefore, the only solutions are and .
Final answer
[(2, 2, 2), (3, 4, 3)]
Techniques
Techniques: modulo, size analysis, order analysis, inequalitiesMultiplicative orderQM-AM-GM-HM / Power Mean