Skip to main content
OlympiadHQ

Browse · MathNet

Print

IMO 2006 Shortlisted Problems

2006 algebra

Problem

The sequence is defined by , and for . Consider the set of ordered pairs for which there is a finite set of positive integers such that , . Prove that there exist real numbers , and , with the following property: An ordered pair of nonnegative integers satisfies the inequality if and only if .

N. B. A sum over the elements of the empty set is assumed to be .
Solution
Let and be the roots of the quadratic equation . So , and . An easy induction shows that the general term of the given sequence satisfies Suppose that the numbers and have the stated property, for appropriately chosen and . Since for each , the expression is bounded as grows to infinity. Because and , this implies . To satisfy , one can set for instance , . We now find the required and for this choice of and . Note first that the above displayed equation gives , . In the sequel, we denote the pairs in by , where is a finite subset of the set of positive integers and , . Since , we obtain On the other hand, in view of , Therefore, according to (1), Thus and is an appropriate choice. Conversely, we prove that if an ordered pair of nonnegative integers satisfies the inequality then . Lemma. Let be nonnegative integers such that . Then there exists a subset of such that Proof. For it suffices to choose the empty subset of as , so let at least one of be nonzero. There exist representations of of the form where is a sequence of nonnegative integers, not necessarily distinct. For instance, we can take summands and summands . Consider all such representations of minimum length and focus on the ones for which has the minimum possible value . Among them, consider the representations where has the minimum possible value . Upon choosing analogously, we obtain a sequence which clearly satisfies . To prove the lemma, it suffices to show that are pairwise distinct. Suppose on the contrary that for some . Let us consider the case first. Observing that , we replace and by and , respectively. Since the new sequence also represents as needed, and the value of in it contradicts the minimum choice of . Let . Then the sum contains at least two summands equal to . On the other hand for all , because the equality implies that a representation of minimum length cannot contain consecutive 's. It follows that contradicting the condition of the lemma. Let ; then contains at least two summands equal to . Like in the case , we also infer that and for all . Therefore which is a contradiction again. The conclusion follows.

Techniques

Recurrence relationsSums and productsLinear and quadratic inequalities