Browse · MathNet
PrintChina-TST-2023B
China 2023 algebra
Problem
Given an integer . Find the minimum real number such that for any real numbers , and , the following inequality holds:
Solution
We will prove that is the desired minimum value. Let's first prove a few lemmas.
Lemma 1: The sequence is strictly increasing.
Proof: Note that Therefore, .
Lemma 2: Let , , and be non-negative real numbers. Then Proof: It is clear that . Therefore, Hence, Lemma 2 holds.
Lemma 3: Let , be positive real numbers. Then Proof: The inequality in Lemma 3 is equivalent to Firstly, we have (1)
Furthermore, since and , we have Therefore, combining (1) and (2), we obtain the desired inequality.
Proof: Let's return to the original problem. First, we take and . Then, we have Next, we will prove that satisfies the desired inequality. That is, we need to prove that for any real numbers , we have Let , (), and . Note that Therefore, to prove (3), it suffices to prove that for any real numbers , if , then Without loss of generality, let's assume that . By Lemma 1 and Lemma 2, we can combine all negative terms in . Therefore, to prove (4), it suffices to prove that for any non-negative real numbers , if , then If , then Therefore, (5) holds.
If , then there must exist some . By Lemma 3, after adjusting to and to , the difference between the left-hand side and the right-hand side of (5) strictly decreases. After a finite number of adjustments, we will eventually reach the case where . Therefore, (5) holds.
Combining the above, we conclude that the minimum value of satisfying the given conditions is .
Lemma 1: The sequence is strictly increasing.
Proof: Note that Therefore, .
Lemma 2: Let , , and be non-negative real numbers. Then Proof: It is clear that . Therefore, Hence, Lemma 2 holds.
Lemma 3: Let , be positive real numbers. Then Proof: The inequality in Lemma 3 is equivalent to Firstly, we have (1)
Furthermore, since and , we have Therefore, combining (1) and (2), we obtain the desired inequality.
Proof: Let's return to the original problem. First, we take and . Then, we have Next, we will prove that satisfies the desired inequality. That is, we need to prove that for any real numbers , we have Let , (), and . Note that Therefore, to prove (3), it suffices to prove that for any real numbers , if , then Without loss of generality, let's assume that . By Lemma 1 and Lemma 2, we can combine all negative terms in . Therefore, to prove (4), it suffices to prove that for any non-negative real numbers , if , then If , then Therefore, (5) holds.
If , then there must exist some . By Lemma 3, after adjusting to and to , the difference between the left-hand side and the right-hand side of (5) strictly decreases. After a finite number of adjustments, we will eventually reach the case where . Therefore, (5) holds.
Combining the above, we conclude that the minimum value of satisfying the given conditions is .
Final answer
(n - 1 + sqrt(n - 1)) / sqrt(n)
Techniques
Cauchy-SchwarzJensen / smoothing