Browse · MATH
Printjmc
algebra intermediate
Problem
Let for and let for and Also, let
Note: The summation notation means to sum over all positive integers such that
Given that
for some constants and , find
Note: The summation notation means to sum over all positive integers such that
Given that
for some constants and , find
Solution
If we write the value of at the point in the plane and border the resulting array with zeros as in the diagram,
Numbers with a appended belong to ; numbers with a appended belong to .
we see that the recursion relation together with the given values for and amount to the assertion that every non-zero entry in this array (except ) is the sum of the entry immediately to its left, the entry just below it, and the entry diagonally below it to the left.
Now is the sum of the terms on the nd diagonal, and it is clear from the diagram that each non-zero term on the st diagonal enters this sum twice while each term on the th diagonal enters once; hence,
This expression can be verified as follows:
This is the diagonal running from to We would like to apply the recursion relation, but it does not apply for or so we detach them from the sum and then expand using the recursion relation:
The sum of is the diagonal corresponding to The other two sums correspond to most of the diagonal pertaining to though each one is missing one of its boundary value 1 terms. Setting in two of the sums and use the facts that and we have
So or so
Numbers with a appended belong to ; numbers with a appended belong to .
we see that the recursion relation together with the given values for and amount to the assertion that every non-zero entry in this array (except ) is the sum of the entry immediately to its left, the entry just below it, and the entry diagonally below it to the left.
Now is the sum of the terms on the nd diagonal, and it is clear from the diagram that each non-zero term on the st diagonal enters this sum twice while each term on the th diagonal enters once; hence,
This expression can be verified as follows:
This is the diagonal running from to We would like to apply the recursion relation, but it does not apply for or so we detach them from the sum and then expand using the recursion relation:
The sum of is the diagonal corresponding to The other two sums correspond to most of the diagonal pertaining to though each one is missing one of its boundary value 1 terms. Setting in two of the sums and use the facts that and we have
So or so
Final answer
2