Browse · MathNet
Print72nd Czech and Slovak Mathematical Olympiad
Czech Republic number theory
Problem
Find all triples of positive integers , , for which the product is equal to the power of a prime number with an integer exponent.
Solution
First, let us note that at least one of the numbers , and must be even. Indeed, two of the three numbers , , have the same parity, so their sum is even. If the product we investigate is a power of a prime , then each of the four factors must be a power of . As we already know, one of the first three factors is even, so . Each of the four factors is therefore a power of two, which is greater than , since the numbers are positive integers. Hence, each factor is an even number.
Further observe that the numbers , , are all even numbers, if and only if the numbers all have the same parity. Since is even, and must be even numbers. Therefore, we can write , , and , where are positive integers. Then of course The product of the last four parentheses must be a power of two. The numbers are therefore solutions to the original problem with the constant 2036 replaced by 1018. For the same reason as above , and must be even. We denote by and respectively their halves (they are again positive integers) and we get And again, we have the same problem with the constant 509, so the numbers , and necessarily have the same parity. However, since the number 509 is odd, and must be odd numbers. We see that the triple satisfies the problem (since is a power of two), so the corresponding triple is a solution to the original problem. We show that it is the only solution.
Suppose that at least one of the numbers is greater than one, let it be without loss of generality. Then, of course, the power of two equal to is greater than 2, so it is divisible by four. This means that dividing by four one of the numbers gives a remainder of 1 and the other a remainder of 3. So the third odd number has the same remainder when divided by four as one of the numbers . The sum of with this number then has a remainder of 2, and since this sum is also a power of two, it must be the power of . It follows that and (the equality of is ruled out by our assumption ). Thus the remainder 3 when divided by four necessarily gives . But then the number gives remainder 2, so it is not a power of two, and that is a contradiction.
Conclusion. A single triple satisfies the problem statement.
---
Alternative solution.
Let hold without loss of generality, so then . The product is a power of some prime number if and only if powers of that prime are all four factors of , and . So let , and for some prime and non-negative integers and . For these, by the theorem of the introduction .
If , and hence and , with respect to , we would have which is impossible. Necessarily, then, , so , where . Then of course , and so , so , e.g. , and therefore and . Since , it is also for some integer , which obviously satisfies the condition .
By the conclusion of the previous paragraph, the numbers satisfy the equality Note that dividing by 16 number 2036 gives the remainder of 4, while certainly gives a remainder of 0 if . This implies . The summands and —as powers of two—are congruent to 1, 2, 4, 8 or 0 (mod 16). It is easy to see that the derived congruence holds only if one of the powers of yields a residue of 4 and the other 8. Then . However, since , it is necessarily , and therefore and . Hence and , whence also . This gives us the only possible triple . This is indeed the solution to the problem—the product of the problem is then , while and .
Further observe that the numbers , , are all even numbers, if and only if the numbers all have the same parity. Since is even, and must be even numbers. Therefore, we can write , , and , where are positive integers. Then of course The product of the last four parentheses must be a power of two. The numbers are therefore solutions to the original problem with the constant 2036 replaced by 1018. For the same reason as above , and must be even. We denote by and respectively their halves (they are again positive integers) and we get And again, we have the same problem with the constant 509, so the numbers , and necessarily have the same parity. However, since the number 509 is odd, and must be odd numbers. We see that the triple satisfies the problem (since is a power of two), so the corresponding triple is a solution to the original problem. We show that it is the only solution.
Suppose that at least one of the numbers is greater than one, let it be without loss of generality. Then, of course, the power of two equal to is greater than 2, so it is divisible by four. This means that dividing by four one of the numbers gives a remainder of 1 and the other a remainder of 3. So the third odd number has the same remainder when divided by four as one of the numbers . The sum of with this number then has a remainder of 2, and since this sum is also a power of two, it must be the power of . It follows that and (the equality of is ruled out by our assumption ). Thus the remainder 3 when divided by four necessarily gives . But then the number gives remainder 2, so it is not a power of two, and that is a contradiction.
Conclusion. A single triple satisfies the problem statement.
---
Alternative solution.
Let hold without loss of generality, so then . The product is a power of some prime number if and only if powers of that prime are all four factors of , and . So let , and for some prime and non-negative integers and . For these, by the theorem of the introduction .
If , and hence and , with respect to , we would have which is impossible. Necessarily, then, , so , where . Then of course , and so , so , e.g. , and therefore and . Since , it is also for some integer , which obviously satisfies the condition .
By the conclusion of the previous paragraph, the numbers satisfy the equality Note that dividing by 16 number 2036 gives the remainder of 4, while certainly gives a remainder of 0 if . This implies . The summands and —as powers of two—are congruent to 1, 2, 4, 8 or 0 (mod 16). It is easy to see that the derived congruence holds only if one of the powers of yields a residue of 4 and the other 8. Then . However, since , it is necessarily , and therefore and . Hence and , whence also . This gives us the only possible triple . This is indeed the solution to the problem—the product of the problem is then , while and .
Final answer
(4, 4, 4)
Techniques
Prime numbersFactorization techniquesIntegersOther