Browse · MathNet
PrintIMO 2019 Shortlisted Problems
2019 algebra
Problem
Let be a positive integer and be real numbers such that Define the set by Prove that, if is not empty, then
Solution
Define sets and by We have So it suffices to show that if (and hence ) are nonempty, then Partition the indices into sets , and such that Then The first inequality holds because all of the positive terms in the RHS are also in the LHS, and all of the negative terms in the LHS are also in the RHS. The first inequality attains equality only if both sides have the same negative terms, which implies whenever ; the second inequality attains equality only if . But then we would have . So nonempty implies that the inequality holds strictly, as required.
---
Alternative solution.
Consider as in Solution 1, set and let We know that , and we need to prove that . Notice that (with equality only if ), and (with equality only if there do not exist and with ). Therefore, If is not empty and , then there must exist with , and hence the earlier equality conditions cannot both occur.
---
Alternative solution.
Consider as in Solution 1, set and let We know that , and we need to prove that . Notice that (with equality only if ), and (with equality only if there do not exist and with ). Therefore, If is not empty and , then there must exist with , and hence the earlier equality conditions cannot both occur.
Techniques
Linear and quadratic inequalitiesSums and products