Browse · MathNet
PrintXIV APMO
algebra
Problem
Let be a sequence of non-negative integers, where is a positive integer. Let Prove that where is the greatest integer less than or equal to , and for (and ). When does equality hold?
Solution
Assume without loss of generality that , and let . Let be any (fixed) index for which . Our inequality is equivalent to proving that Now for , is the product of factors. For example, . The left side of inequality (1) therefore is the product of factors, all of which are greater than . Similarly, the right side of (1) is the product of factors, all of which are at most . Since , . This proves the inequality.
Equality in (1) holds if and only if either: (i) , that is, both sides of (1) are the empty product, which occurs if and only if ; or (ii) and , that is, the only factors on either side of (1) are 's, which occurs if and only if for all .
---
Alternative solution.
Assume without loss of generality that . Let and . Our proof is by induction on .
We first do the case or separately. Then and for some and . In this case we have , so the inequality to be proven is just , which is obvious. Equality holds if and only if either , that is, ; or if , that is, and .
So assume that and that the inequality holds for all sequences with smaller values of , or with the same value of and smaller values of . Then the sequence though not necessarily in non-decreasing order any more, does have either a smaller value of , or the same value of and a smaller value of , but in any case has the same value of . Thus, by induction and since , which completes the proof. Equality cannot hold in this case.
Equality in (1) holds if and only if either: (i) , that is, both sides of (1) are the empty product, which occurs if and only if ; or (ii) and , that is, the only factors on either side of (1) are 's, which occurs if and only if for all .
---
Alternative solution.
Assume without loss of generality that . Let and . Our proof is by induction on .
We first do the case or separately. Then and for some and . In this case we have , so the inequality to be proven is just , which is obvious. Equality holds if and only if either , that is, ; or if , that is, and .
So assume that and that the inequality holds for all sequences with smaller values of , or with the same value of and smaller values of . Then the sequence though not necessarily in non-decreasing order any more, does have either a smaller value of , or the same value of and a smaller value of , but in any case has the same value of . Thus, by induction and since , which completes the proof. Equality cannot hold in this case.
Final answer
Equality holds if and only if either all terms are equal, or every term is either zero or one.
Techniques
Jensen / smoothingInduction / smoothingIntegers