Browse · MathNet
PrintInternational Mathematical Olympiad
number theory
Problem
Prove that is not divisible by for any positive integer .
Solution
Notice that if is even, then , but , contradiction. So, from now on we assume that is odd, . Obviously is not possible, so . Notice that is coprime to , and . Let be the smallest positive multiple of that can be written in the form of either or with some integers and . Note that is a multiple of , so the set of such multiples is non-empty, and therefore is well-defined.
I. First we show that . Consider the numbers There are choices for and , so there are more than possible pairs . Hence, two of these sums are congruent modulo : . Now choose and ; at least one of is nonzero, and From we can see that is a multiple of . Since at least one of and is nonzero, . Hence, by the choice of , we have . That shows that .
II. Next, we show that cannot be divisible by , and . Since equals either or with some integers , we have six cases to check. In all six cases, we will get a contradiction by presenting another multiple of , smaller than . - If and , then and . - If and , then and . - If and , then and . - If and , then and . - If and , then . - If and , then . (The last two expressions can be obtained from and .) In all six cases, we found that either , or is of the form or . Since is coprime to , and , the presented number is a multiple of , but this contradicts the minimality of .
III. The last remaining case is , so either or . We will get a contradiction by considering the two sides modulo , and . - is not possible, because , but . - is not possible, because , but . - is not possible, because , but . - is not possible, because , but . We found a contradiction in all cases, that completes the solution.
---
Alternative solution.
Suppose again that . Like in the first solution, we conclude that must be odd, and , so . Using Jacobi symbols, contradiction.
I. First we show that . Consider the numbers There are choices for and , so there are more than possible pairs . Hence, two of these sums are congruent modulo : . Now choose and ; at least one of is nonzero, and From we can see that is a multiple of . Since at least one of and is nonzero, . Hence, by the choice of , we have . That shows that .
II. Next, we show that cannot be divisible by , and . Since equals either or with some integers , we have six cases to check. In all six cases, we will get a contradiction by presenting another multiple of , smaller than . - If and , then and . - If and , then and . - If and , then and . - If and , then and . - If and , then . - If and , then . (The last two expressions can be obtained from and .) In all six cases, we found that either , or is of the form or . Since is coprime to , and , the presented number is a multiple of , but this contradicts the minimality of .
III. The last remaining case is , so either or . We will get a contradiction by considering the two sides modulo , and . - is not possible, because , but . - is not possible, because , but . - is not possible, because , but . - is not possible, because , but . We found a contradiction in all cases, that completes the solution.
---
Alternative solution.
Suppose again that . Like in the first solution, we conclude that must be odd, and , so . Using Jacobi symbols, contradiction.
Techniques
Quadratic residuesInfinite descent / root flippingPigeonhole principleQuadratic forms