Browse · MathNet
PrintSelection and Training Session
Belarus number theory
Problem
Given natural number and different odd prime numbers , with Prove that
a) is divisible by for some .
b) Can be divisible by for exactly one of ?
a) is divisible by for some .
b) Can be divisible by for exactly one of ?
Solution
a) (Solution of A.Ivanin, O.Volod'ko, A.Zhuk.) (Further we put .) Let be the greatest number among all (). The condition implies that and are relatively prime for all . Then by Little Fermat Theorem. Since, by the problem condition, , we also have where . But from it follows that or . If then , , a contradiction. Hence and , q.e.d.
b) Take any prime . By the Dirichlet theorem, we can choose a sequence of primes such that .
Let , . Further, choose for any a primitive root and set . In particular, and . Now by the Chinese Remainder Theorem, there exists an such that and for . This satisfies the condition.
b) Take any prime . By the Dirichlet theorem, we can choose a sequence of primes such that .
Let , . Further, choose for any a primitive root and set . In particular, and . Now by the Chinese Remainder Theorem, there exists an such that and for . This satisfies the condition.
Final answer
a) There exists an index i such that p_i divides a−1. b) Yes; it is possible for a−1 to be divisible by exactly one of the primes.
Techniques
Fermat / Euler / Wilson theoremsGreatest common divisors (gcd)Chinese remainder theoremPrimitive roots mod p / p^nOther