Browse · MathNet
Print49th International Mathematical Olympiad Spain
algebra
Problem
Let be a function which satisfies Prove that there is a positive integer which is not a value of .
Solution
Suppose that the statement is false and . We prove several properties of the function in order to reach a contradiction.
To start with, observe that one can assume . Indeed, let be such that , and consider the function . By substituting and for and in (1), we have So satisfies the functional equation (1), with the additional property . Also, and have the same set of values: . Henceforth we assume .
Claim 1. For an arbitrary fixed we have .
Proof. Equation (1) and imply . The claim follows.
We will use Claim 1 in the special cases and :
Claim 2. If for some then for all nonnegative rational . Furthermore, if for some nonnegative rational then for all .
Proof. For all we have by (1) Since attains all positive integer values, this yields for all . Let be a positive rational number. Then repetitions of the last step yield Now let for some nonnegative rational , and let . As , the previous conclusion yields successively , as needed.
Claim 3. The equality holds for all nonnegative rational .
Proof. Let be a positive integer such that . Such an exists by (2). Applying the second statement of Claim 2 with and yields . Given that , the first statement of Claim 2 implies for all nonnegative rational .
Claim 4. The equality holds for every .
Proof. For a nonnegative rational we set in (1) and use Claim 3 to obtain By (2), for each there exists a such that . Applying the last equation with , we have Now we are ready to obtain a contradiction. Let be such that . Such an exists by (2). Let , where are coprime. Observe that as is not an integer. Choose so that that . Because , Claim 2 implies . Now ; on the other hand by successive applications of Claim 3. Finally, by Claim 4, leading to the impossible . The solution is complete.
To start with, observe that one can assume . Indeed, let be such that , and consider the function . By substituting and for and in (1), we have So satisfies the functional equation (1), with the additional property . Also, and have the same set of values: . Henceforth we assume .
Claim 1. For an arbitrary fixed we have .
Proof. Equation (1) and imply . The claim follows.
We will use Claim 1 in the special cases and :
Claim 2. If for some then for all nonnegative rational . Furthermore, if for some nonnegative rational then for all .
Proof. For all we have by (1) Since attains all positive integer values, this yields for all . Let be a positive rational number. Then repetitions of the last step yield Now let for some nonnegative rational , and let . As , the previous conclusion yields successively , as needed.
Claim 3. The equality holds for all nonnegative rational .
Proof. Let be a positive integer such that . Such an exists by (2). Applying the second statement of Claim 2 with and yields . Given that , the first statement of Claim 2 implies for all nonnegative rational .
Claim 4. The equality holds for every .
Proof. For a nonnegative rational we set in (1) and use Claim 3 to obtain By (2), for each there exists a such that . Applying the last equation with , we have Now we are ready to obtain a contradiction. Let be such that . Such an exists by (2). Let , where are coprime. Observe that as is not an integer. Choose so that that . Because , Claim 2 implies . Now ; on the other hand by successive applications of Claim 3. Finally, by Claim 4, leading to the impossible . The solution is complete.
Techniques
Injectivity / surjectivityExistential quantifiersGreatest common divisors (gcd)