Browse · MathNet
PrintTST
United States counting and probability
Problem
Let be the minimal number of colors needed to properly color the directed edges of a tournament on vertices so that no two edges of the same color form a directed path of length . Determine for all .
Solution
Let be the answer to the problem. We claim that for all . The proof is divided into showing that this quantity is both an upper and a lower bound.
Lower Bound. We show that every tournament on vertices has directed-edge-chromatic number at least . We prove this by strong induction on . As our base case, if , then clearly . Now, for , assume by the strong inductive hypothesis that for all . Consider any proper directed-edge-coloring of an -vertex directed graph (vertex set ) with colors. Pick an arbitrary color, and let be the set of vertices for which there exists an edge of that color, and let be the set of vertices for which there exists an edge of the form . Clearly since the coloring is proper . Thus, there exists such that has size at most . Notice that has size at least and also has no edges of the originally chosen color. Thus, the graph induced by has a proper directed-edge-coloring of colors. By the inductive hypothesis, this implies that Therefore, .
Upper Bound. We exhibit a proper directed-edge-coloring with colors of a tournament with vertices. Consider the tournament with vertices such that there is a directed edge from to if and only if . Label our colors . Color the edge the largest such that has a and has a in the th place of their binary representations. Such a always exists and is at most because and requires at most digits in its binary representation. Assume for sake of contradiction that this is not a proper directed-edge-coloring. Then, there would exist edge and of color . Thus, would have both and in the th place of its binary representation, contradiction. Hence, this exhibited coloring is proper so .
Thus, the minimal directed-edge-chromatic number among tournaments on vertices is .
Lower Bound. We show that every tournament on vertices has directed-edge-chromatic number at least . We prove this by strong induction on . As our base case, if , then clearly . Now, for , assume by the strong inductive hypothesis that for all . Consider any proper directed-edge-coloring of an -vertex directed graph (vertex set ) with colors. Pick an arbitrary color, and let be the set of vertices for which there exists an edge of that color, and let be the set of vertices for which there exists an edge of the form . Clearly since the coloring is proper . Thus, there exists such that has size at most . Notice that has size at least and also has no edges of the originally chosen color. Thus, the graph induced by has a proper directed-edge-coloring of colors. By the inductive hypothesis, this implies that Therefore, .
Upper Bound. We exhibit a proper directed-edge-coloring with colors of a tournament with vertices. Consider the tournament with vertices such that there is a directed edge from to if and only if . Label our colors . Color the edge the largest such that has a and has a in the th place of their binary representations. Such a always exists and is at most because and requires at most digits in its binary representation. Assume for sake of contradiction that this is not a proper directed-edge-coloring. Then, there would exist edge and of color . Thus, would have both and in the th place of its binary representation, contradiction. Hence, this exhibited coloring is proper so .
Thus, the minimal directed-edge-chromatic number among tournaments on vertices is .
Final answer
⌈log n⌉
Techniques
Coloring schemes, extremal argumentsInduction / smoothing