Browse · MathNet
Print63rd Czech and Slovak Mathematical Olympiad
Czech Republic number theory
Problem
Let be a natural number whose all positive divisors are denoted as in such a way that (thus and ). Determine all the values of for which both equalities and hold. (Matúš Harminc)
Solution
We distinguish whether is odd or even.
i) The case of odd. Since all the 's are odd too, it follows from that as well as , hence . In view of , the relations imply that . Substituting this into , we obtain or . Thus the four numbers 1, 3, 11 and 33 are divisors of , more exactly all its divisors smaller than 50, since the fifth divisor satisfies . Consequently, it holds that , , , , , and thus . The number 2013 is satisfactory indeed, because its first small divisors as indicated in the last sentence and moreover, the subsequent divisors are and ; hence as required.
ii) The case of even. Now the equality implies that and hence as well. Since , and , we conclude that either , or , with some integer . But the last is impossible (otherwise is a divisor of with , a contradiction), Therefore, we have , and hence 3 is a divisor of between and , a contradiction. In this way, the nonexistence of any satisfactory even is proven.
Answer. The problem has the only solution .
---
Alternative solution.
The divisors and of , with , can be represented as and , where and () are some positive divisors of again. Substituting this into , we obtain (after cancelling ) an equation which can be solved in a standard way, for example by a simple factorization: The first equation implies that and hence as well. Note that yields . Taking into account the prime factorization , we conclude that the ordered pair of factors must belong to the following set However, congruences modulo 3 imply the only two pairs (88, 1) and (22, 4) are admissible. The corresponding pairs are (33, 3) and (11, 4), respectively.
If , then (and ), thus 1, 3, 11 and 33 are divisors of which leads (as in the above solution) to the solution . If , then and , thus 1, 2, 4, 11, 22 and 44 are divisors of , which contradicts .
i) The case of odd. Since all the 's are odd too, it follows from that as well as , hence . In view of , the relations imply that . Substituting this into , we obtain or . Thus the four numbers 1, 3, 11 and 33 are divisors of , more exactly all its divisors smaller than 50, since the fifth divisor satisfies . Consequently, it holds that , , , , , and thus . The number 2013 is satisfactory indeed, because its first small divisors as indicated in the last sentence and moreover, the subsequent divisors are and ; hence as required.
ii) The case of even. Now the equality implies that and hence as well. Since , and , we conclude that either , or , with some integer . But the last is impossible (otherwise is a divisor of with , a contradiction), Therefore, we have , and hence 3 is a divisor of between and , a contradiction. In this way, the nonexistence of any satisfactory even is proven.
Answer. The problem has the only solution .
---
Alternative solution.
The divisors and of , with , can be represented as and , where and () are some positive divisors of again. Substituting this into , we obtain (after cancelling ) an equation which can be solved in a standard way, for example by a simple factorization: The first equation implies that and hence as well. Note that yields . Taking into account the prime factorization , we conclude that the ordered pair of factors must belong to the following set However, congruences modulo 3 imply the only two pairs (88, 1) and (22, 4) are admissible. The corresponding pairs are (33, 3) and (11, 4), respectively.
If , then (and ), thus 1, 3, 11 and 33 are divisors of which leads (as in the above solution) to the solution . If , then and , thus 1, 2, 4, 11, 22 and 44 are divisors of , which contradicts .
Final answer
2013
Techniques
Factorization techniquesTechniques: modulo, size analysis, order analysis, inequalities