Browse · MathNet
PrintJapan 2007
Japan 2007 counting and probability
Problem
We have a square grid of . We call a rectangle good if its edges are all along the border of small squares. What is the smallest with the following property?
Property: If small squares are removed from the grid, we can divide remaining area into or less number of good rectangles.




Property: If small squares are removed from the grid, we can divide remaining area into or less number of good rectangles.
Solution
Let denote the square on the intersection of the -th row and the -th column.
First, let us show that works. Remove the squares one by one. The initial grid can be divided into good rectangle. If square is removed from a good rectangle, we can divide the remaining part into or less good rectangles as shown in the figure below. By this method we can divide the final grid into or less good rectangles.
Now we only have to show that with the property in this problem is more than or equal to . We will show rectangles are needed when are removed. Paint all squares which are next to the removed ones in red. We have red squares. Rectangles containing or cannot have another red square inside it. For a rectangle with other red squares, we can assume, by rotating and flipping, that it contains square in the picture below.
It cannot contain dotted squares because such rectangle contains some removed squares. The only red squares that are not dotted are and . A rectangle with in its inside cannot contain and together, and if it contains or it also have in it.
So no rectangles have red squares and every rectangle with red squares contains some square of the form . Therefore .
First, let us show that works. Remove the squares one by one. The initial grid can be divided into good rectangle. If square is removed from a good rectangle, we can divide the remaining part into or less good rectangles as shown in the figure below. By this method we can divide the final grid into or less good rectangles.
Now we only have to show that with the property in this problem is more than or equal to . We will show rectangles are needed when are removed. Paint all squares which are next to the removed ones in red. We have red squares. Rectangles containing or cannot have another red square inside it. For a rectangle with other red squares, we can assume, by rotating and flipping, that it contains square in the picture below.
It cannot contain dotted squares because such rectangle contains some removed squares. The only red squares that are not dotted are and . A rectangle with in its inside cannot contain and together, and if it contains or it also have in it.
So no rectangles have red squares and every rectangle with red squares contains some square of the form . Therefore .
Final answer
28
Techniques
Coloring schemes, extremal argumentsInduction / smoothing