Browse · MathNet
PrintAustriaMO2011
Austria 2011 number theory
Problem
Determine all pairs of non-negative integers, such that divides . (Note that holds.)
Solution
For brevity, we name and .
For , we obtain , and therefore . We see that is a solution.
For and , we obtain and , and again . We see that is, in fact a solution for all values of .
For , we obtain and . The only way can hold is for . We see that is also a solution.
For , we obtain and , and again . is therefore a solution for all values of .
We now consider the general case, where and . Since we see that must hold. For , we must have , and therefore . The only solution in this case is therefore .
We now consider large values of , specifically . For , we have , and we can show that , which yields a contradiction. We show this by induction. For , we have , which is certainly true. If we can now assume that is true, and wish to show , we note that the latter expression results from the former by multiplying the left side with and the right side with , which is certainly not greater than , which proves the induction. If , we have , which is then also certainly impossible.
Finally, the case remains. As before, we can show that for (noting ). The only possible values for remaining are therefore , and . For , we would have , for we would have , and for we would have , none of which is true.
In summary, the solutions are , all pairs and all pairs . qed
For , we obtain , and therefore . We see that is a solution.
For and , we obtain and , and again . We see that is, in fact a solution for all values of .
For , we obtain and . The only way can hold is for . We see that is also a solution.
For , we obtain and , and again . is therefore a solution for all values of .
We now consider the general case, where and . Since we see that must hold. For , we must have , and therefore . The only solution in this case is therefore .
We now consider large values of , specifically . For , we have , and we can show that , which yields a contradiction. We show this by induction. For , we have , which is certainly true. If we can now assume that is true, and wish to show , we note that the latter expression results from the former by multiplying the left side with and the right side with , which is certainly not greater than , which proves the induction. If , we have , which is then also certainly impossible.
Finally, the case remains. As before, we can show that for (noting ). The only possible values for remaining are therefore , and . For , we would have , for we would have , and for we would have , none of which is true.
In summary, the solutions are , all pairs and all pairs . qed
Final answer
{(a,0) for all nonnegative integers a} ∪ {(0,b) for all nonnegative integers b} ∪ {(2,1)}
Techniques
Factorization techniquesTechniques: modulo, size analysis, order analysis, inequalitiesExponential functions