Browse · MathNet
PrintIMO 2016 Shortlisted Problems
2016 number theory
Problem
Define . For any positive integers and , the set is said to be fragrant if none of its elements is relatively prime to the product of the other elements. Determine the smallest size of a fragrant set.
Solution
We have the following observations. (i) for any . We have . Noting that is odd and , the claim follows.
(ii) for and for . From and the fact that is odd, must be a divisor of . The claim follows by checking directly.
(iii) for and for . From and the fact that is odd, must be a divisor of . The claim follows by checking directly.
Suppose there exists a fragrant set with at most elements. We may assume it contains exactly elements since the following argument also works with fewer elements. Consider . From (i), it is relatively prime to and . Without loss of generality, assume . From (ii), we have . The same observation implies . In order that the set is fragrant, and must both be greater than . From (iii), this holds only when both and are congruent to , which is a contradiction.
It now suffices to construct a fragrant set of size . By the Chinese Remainder Theorem, we can take a positive integer such that For example, we may take . From (ii), both and are divisible by . From (iii), both and are divisible by . One also checks from and that and are divisible by . Therefore, the set is fragrant.
Therefore, the smallest size of a fragrant set is .
(ii) for and for . From and the fact that is odd, must be a divisor of . The claim follows by checking directly.
(iii) for and for . From and the fact that is odd, must be a divisor of . The claim follows by checking directly.
Suppose there exists a fragrant set with at most elements. We may assume it contains exactly elements since the following argument also works with fewer elements. Consider . From (i), it is relatively prime to and . Without loss of generality, assume . From (ii), we have . The same observation implies . In order that the set is fragrant, and must both be greater than . From (iii), this holds only when both and are congruent to , which is a contradiction.
It now suffices to construct a fragrant set of size . By the Chinese Remainder Theorem, we can take a positive integer such that For example, we may take . From (ii), both and are divisible by . From (iii), both and are divisible by . One also checks from and that and are divisible by . Therefore, the set is fragrant.
Therefore, the smallest size of a fragrant set is .
Final answer
6
Techniques
Greatest common divisors (gcd)Chinese remainder theoremPolynomials mod p