Browse · MathNet
PrintEstonian Mathematical Olympiad
Estonia algebra
Problem
A sequence satisfies , , and for any . A sequence satisfies , , and for any . A sequence satisfies , , and for any . Order the numbers , and by size.
Solution
Since and , we have for any . Next note that , , and Now prove by induction that for any . Assume that the statement holds for every with . As , we get , which we wanted to prove. Hence for any .
---
Alternative solution.
As in Solution 1 show that for any . To show that for any we prove by induction that ; since for , it follows for any . For simplicity define ; then the inequality holds for as equality and for we have . So assuming the hypothesis holds for and , we get for If or then , hence So in these cases . It remains to observe that Consequently the inequality holds in all cases.
---
Alternative solution.
By mathematical induction it is easy to see that for any . Indeed it is true for and if and the claim holds for then so it holds for . Also for any . Indeed it is true for because , and if and the claim holds for then so the claim holds for . Hence for any we have Consider the sequence . Clearly is a product of powers of primes 2, 3 and 5. From the definition of for all the powers of satisfy . Calculate the powers of 2, 3 and 5 in the canonical representation of the first 9 terms:
We see that for and . But if , and for some , then So by mathematical induction for all and . Consequently for all .
---
Alternative solution.
As in Solution 1 show that for any . To show that for any we prove by induction that ; since for , it follows for any . For simplicity define ; then the inequality holds for as equality and for we have . So assuming the hypothesis holds for and , we get for If or then , hence So in these cases . It remains to observe that Consequently the inequality holds in all cases.
---
Alternative solution.
By mathematical induction it is easy to see that for any . Indeed it is true for and if and the claim holds for then so it holds for . Also for any . Indeed it is true for because , and if and the claim holds for then so the claim holds for . Hence for any we have Consider the sequence . Clearly is a product of powers of primes 2, 3 and 5. From the definition of for all the powers of satisfy . Calculate the powers of 2, 3 and 5 in the canonical representation of the first 9 terms:
| n | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 10 | 18 | 36 | |
| 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 9 | 19 | 36 | |
| 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 9 | 18 | 37 |
Final answer
a_{1000} < c_{1000} < b_{1000}
Techniques
Recurrence relationsFactorization techniques