Skip to main content
OlympiadHQ

Browse · MathNet

Print

The Problems of Ukrainian Authors

Ukraine number theory

Problem

Consider the infinite sequences of positive integer numbers, in which each positive integer number to meet among elements of this sequence is equal once. Let , be such a sequence. Name it sequence "consecutive" if for each positive integer number and for any positive integer numbers and such that , the following inequality holds: . For example, the sequence is "consecutive".

a) Prove that there exists a "consecutive" sequence which is different from .

b) Does there exist a "consecutive" sequence for which the inequality , holds?

c) Does there exist a "consecutive" sequence for which the inequality , holds?
Solution
Answer: b) such sequence exists; c) such sequence doesn't exist.

a. Show the example of such a "consecutive" sequence which is different from . Let be the unique representation of as a product of primes, then the sequence , satisfies the statement of the problem.

Really, if , , and , then , as and . The constructed sequence is non-trivial, because , and is constructed using a permutation of the exponents of in its prime factorization by means of shifting the exponents of two and three.

b. Next, let Then if . If now we construct a sequence in which for the number represented as a product of primes, we shift the exponents of to , then the constructed sequence satisfies the statement of the problem. Really, let for Then the sequence is "consecutive", because and .

Moreover, if then , because if , then the following equalities hold: , , , . But is unrestrictedly large beginning with some iteration, so if there exists nonzero in the prime factorization of , then in its representation must exist nonzero powers of arbitrarily large prime numbers, which is a contradiction.

c. If for some sequence holds , then there exists such that . Then and — contradiction, because .
Final answer
a) Yes, a nontrivial consecutive sequence exists (e.g., swap the exponents of two and three in prime factorizations). b) Yes, such a sequence exists with a_n ≠ n for all n ≥ 2. c) No, such a sequence does not exist for all n ≥ 1.

Techniques

Factorization techniquesPrime numbersPermutations / basic group theory