Browse · MathNet
PrintChina Mathematical Olympiad
China counting and probability
Problem
A certain company wants to employ one secretary. Ten persons apply. The manager decides to interview them one by one according to the order of their applications. The first applicants should not be employed. From the fourth onward an applicant will be compared with the preceding ones. If he exceeds in ability all the preceding applicants, he will be employed. Otherwise he will not, and the interview goes on. If the preceding nine persons are not employed, the last one will be employed.
Suppose that the persons are different from each other in ability, and we can arrange them according to their ability rating from superior to inferior, such as st, nd, ..., th. Obviously, whether an applicant will be eventually employed by the company depends on the order of the applications. As it is known, there are such permutations in all. Now denote by the number of the permutations such that the applicant with the -th ability rating is employed and the probability for him to be employed is . (posed by Su Chun)
Prove that under the policy given by the manager, we have the following properties:
Suppose that the persons are different from each other in ability, and we can arrange them according to their ability rating from superior to inferior, such as st, nd, ..., th. Obviously, whether an applicant will be eventually employed by the company depends on the order of the applications. As it is known, there are such permutations in all. Now denote by the number of the permutations such that the applicant with the -th ability rating is employed and the probability for him to be employed is . (posed by Su Chun)
Prove that under the policy given by the manager, we have the following properties:
Solution
Proof We denote by the ability rating of the applicant with the highest ability among the first three interviews. Obviously, . Now we denote by the set of permutations for which the person with the -th ability rating is employed and we denote the corresponding number of permutations by .
(1) It is easy to see that, when , a definite result is to give up the first nine persons and to employ the last interviewee. Now the chance is equal for every person except the one who has the highest ability rating. It is not difficult to see that where “:=” denotes “written as”.
When , a person who is placed -th in ability rating will have no chance to be employed for , and the chance is equal for .
In fact, a person with the -th ability rating is among the first three interviews and there are three ways to choose one out of the three interviews. Those people with their ability rating from the -st to -th are among the later seven interviews, and the first one having the highest ability rating among them is employed. There are ways of such arrangement. The other persons may be arranged arbitrarily on the remainder positions, and we have ways of arrangement. Hence, we have
The result above shows: From ① and ②, we obtain and from ② and ③, we obtain Consequently, (1) is proved.
(2) From ①, we know So the probability for the company to employ one of the bottom three is equal to .
From ② and ③, we can show that Therefore, That is, the probability for the company to employ one of the top three, is greater than .
(1) It is easy to see that, when , a definite result is to give up the first nine persons and to employ the last interviewee. Now the chance is equal for every person except the one who has the highest ability rating. It is not difficult to see that where “:=” denotes “written as”.
When , a person who is placed -th in ability rating will have no chance to be employed for , and the chance is equal for .
In fact, a person with the -th ability rating is among the first three interviews and there are three ways to choose one out of the three interviews. Those people with their ability rating from the -st to -th are among the later seven interviews, and the first one having the highest ability rating among them is employed. There are ways of such arrangement. The other persons may be arranged arbitrarily on the remainder positions, and we have ways of arrangement. Hence, we have
The result above shows: From ① and ②, we obtain and from ② and ③, we obtain Consequently, (1) is proved.
(2) From ①, we know So the probability for the company to employ one of the bottom three is equal to .
From ② and ③, we can show that Therefore, That is, the probability for the company to employ one of the top three, is greater than .
Techniques
Enumeration with symmetry