Skip to main content
OlympiadHQ

Browse · MathNet

Print

The 65th IMO China National Team Selection Test

China algebra

Problem

Given positive integers and non-negative real numbers . Define Prove that:
Solution
Proof. Consider the set of points as a "monotone path" from to if , , and for every index , we have Given two non-negative decreasing sequences and , define the weight of the monotone path as Lemma: There exists a monotone path such that Proof of the Lemma: We use induction on . When or , the conclusion is trivial. Assume the lemma holds for . Consider the case with . Let By the induction hypothesis, for the sequences and , there exists a monotone path from to such that Let be the monotone path obtained by adding to , then Similarly, for the sequences and , by the induction hypothesis, we have Let and . Multiplying (10) by and adding it to (11) multiplied by , we get thereby completing the proof of the lemma.

Returning to the proof of the stated inequality. Sort as , and sort as . There exists a permutation of such that for each index , ; similarly, there exists a permutation of such that for each index , . By the lemma, there exists a monotone path from (0,0) to (m,n) such that From the definition of a monotone path, for each index we have hence For finite non-empty sets of real numbers and , we have . Let , then and . Thus, we can sequentially choose Since are distinct and between 0 and , they form a permutation of . For each , let , where . From the definition of , we have thus, which proves the desired inequality.

---

Alternative solution.

Proof 2 (Based on the solution by Junfeng Tian). Consider the set of points as a "monotone path" from (0,0) to (m,n) if , , and for every index , we have Noting that , we get We call the left-hand side of the above expression the weight of the monotone path , denoted as . To prove the conclusion, we only need to prove the following proposition (): There exists a monotone path such that First, establish the following lemma: Let , then Proof of the lemma: Let the left-hand side of the above expression be . By symmetry, assume , then Combining with the fact that is non-negative, we get thereby completing the proof of the lemma.

Returning to the proof of proposition . We use induction on . When or , the proposition is clearly true. Assume the proposition holds for , consider the case with . By homogeneity, assume , then . Let By the induction hypothesis, there exists a monotone path from to such that Let be the monotone path obtained by going from to and then following , then Similarly, consider going from to and then using the induction hypothesis, we get Combining these two expressions and using the lemma, we get which completes the proof.

Techniques

Muirhead / majorizationCombinatorial optimizationInduction / smoothing