Browse · MathNet
PrintThe 65th IMO China National Team Selection Test
China algebra
Problem
Given positive integers and non-negative real numbers . Define Prove that:
Solution
Proof. Consider the set of points as a "monotone path" from to if , , and for every index , we have Given two non-negative decreasing sequences and , define the weight of the monotone path as Lemma: There exists a monotone path such that Proof of the Lemma: We use induction on . When or , the conclusion is trivial. Assume the lemma holds for . Consider the case with . Let By the induction hypothesis, for the sequences and , there exists a monotone path from to such that Let be the monotone path obtained by adding to , then Similarly, for the sequences and , by the induction hypothesis, we have Let and . Multiplying (10) by and adding it to (11) multiplied by , we get thereby completing the proof of the lemma.
Returning to the proof of the stated inequality. Sort as , and sort as . There exists a permutation of such that for each index , ; similarly, there exists a permutation of such that for each index , . By the lemma, there exists a monotone path from (0,0) to (m,n) such that From the definition of a monotone path, for each index we have hence For finite non-empty sets of real numbers and , we have . Let , then and . Thus, we can sequentially choose Since are distinct and between 0 and , they form a permutation of . For each , let , where . From the definition of , we have thus, which proves the desired inequality.
---
Alternative solution.
Proof 2 (Based on the solution by Junfeng Tian). Consider the set of points as a "monotone path" from (0,0) to (m,n) if , , and for every index , we have Noting that , we get We call the left-hand side of the above expression the weight of the monotone path , denoted as . To prove the conclusion, we only need to prove the following proposition (): There exists a monotone path such that First, establish the following lemma: Let , then Proof of the lemma: Let the left-hand side of the above expression be . By symmetry, assume , then Combining with the fact that is non-negative, we get thereby completing the proof of the lemma.
Returning to the proof of proposition . We use induction on . When or , the proposition is clearly true. Assume the proposition holds for , consider the case with . By homogeneity, assume , then . Let By the induction hypothesis, there exists a monotone path from to such that Let be the monotone path obtained by going from to and then following , then Similarly, consider going from to and then using the induction hypothesis, we get Combining these two expressions and using the lemma, we get which completes the proof.
Returning to the proof of the stated inequality. Sort as , and sort as . There exists a permutation of such that for each index , ; similarly, there exists a permutation of such that for each index , . By the lemma, there exists a monotone path from (0,0) to (m,n) such that From the definition of a monotone path, for each index we have hence For finite non-empty sets of real numbers and , we have . Let , then and . Thus, we can sequentially choose Since are distinct and between 0 and , they form a permutation of . For each , let , where . From the definition of , we have thus, which proves the desired inequality.
---
Alternative solution.
Proof 2 (Based on the solution by Junfeng Tian). Consider the set of points as a "monotone path" from (0,0) to (m,n) if , , and for every index , we have Noting that , we get We call the left-hand side of the above expression the weight of the monotone path , denoted as . To prove the conclusion, we only need to prove the following proposition (): There exists a monotone path such that First, establish the following lemma: Let , then Proof of the lemma: Let the left-hand side of the above expression be . By symmetry, assume , then Combining with the fact that is non-negative, we get thereby completing the proof of the lemma.
Returning to the proof of proposition . We use induction on . When or , the proposition is clearly true. Assume the proposition holds for , consider the case with . By homogeneity, assume , then . Let By the induction hypothesis, there exists a monotone path from to such that Let be the monotone path obtained by going from to and then following , then Similarly, consider going from to and then using the induction hypothesis, we get Combining these two expressions and using the lemma, we get which completes the proof.
Techniques
Muirhead / majorizationCombinatorial optimizationInduction / smoothing