Skip to main content
OlympiadHQ

Browse · MathNet

Print

USA IMO

United States number theory

Problem

Let be a set of integers (not necessarily positive) such that

a. there exist with ;

b. if and are elements of (possibly equal), then also belongs to .

Prove that is the set of all integers.
Solution
In the solution below we use the expression is stable under to mean that if belongs to , then also belongs to . If , then by condition (b), is stable under and . Hence, it is stable under . Similarly, is stable under . Hence, is stable under and , whenever is an integer linear combination of finitely many numbers in .

By condition (a), and hence as well. For the sake of contradiction, assume that some divides every element in . Then for all . In other words, for each , either or . Given , , by condition (b), so or . Hence, for each . By condition (a), there exist some and in such that , that is, at least one of or cannot be divisible by . Denote such an element of by ; thus, . Similarly, by condition (a), , so cannot divide both and . Thus, there is an element of , call it , such that . By (), and . By condition (b), . Taking in () yields either or , so . Now (*) says that all elements of are even, contradicting condition (a). Hence, our assumption is false and no prime divides every element in .

It follows that . Let be an arbitrary nonzero element of . For each prime divisor of , there exists an element in which is not divisible by that prime. The set consisting of and each of these elements is finite. By construction, , and can be written as an integer linear combination of finitely many elements in and hence in . Therefore, is stable under and . Because is nonempty, it follows that is the set of all integers.

---

Alternative solution.

Define , , and as in the first solution. We present another proof that no prime divides every element in . Suppose, for sake of contradiction, that such a prime does exist. By condition (b), . Therefore, divides , , and . Because , both and equal 1, so does not divide or . But does divide and , so it must divide and . Because by condition (a), this implies , a contradiction. Therefore our original assumption was false, and no such exists.

Techniques

Greatest common divisors (gcd)Prime numbersPolynomials mod p