Browse · MathNet
PrintCroatia_2018
Croatia 2018 counting and probability
Problem
There are 300 contestants at the competition. Each pair of the contestants is either acquainted (knows each other) or unfamiliar with each other, and there are no three contestants who all know each other. Determine the maximum possible such that the following conditions hold: Every contestant is acquainted with at most other contestants. For every positive integer such that , there is at least one contestant who is acquainted with exactly other contestants. (Mongolia 2017)
Solution
The maximum possible is .
Let us assume that there is a contestant, say , who knows other contestants and let those contestants make up a set . There must exist contestants who know exactly , , , other contestants.
We will say that the contestant has degree if he knows exactly other contestants.
Each element in has degree at most . Namely, he cannot know anyone from since there are no three contestants who all know each other (aside from and , there are only contestants).
We conclude that contestants from have at most distinct degrees. Simultaneously, there are contestants not in and different from , so they can have at most distinct degrees.
This shows that there are at most distinct degrees, and therefore it is impossible that there are contestants who know exactly , , , other contestants. Hence, there is no contestant who knows exactly other contestants.
Let us now show that is possible. Denote contestants as and call them A-contestants, and the remaining as and call them B-contestants.
For each and each , such that , let and be acquainted. All the other pairs of contestants are unfamiliar with each other. We claim that this example has , and that all the conditions of the problem are satisfied.
Namely, there are no three contestants who all know each other, because no two A-contestants know each other and no two B-contestants know each other.
Moreso, for , contestant knows contestants and only them. Hence, he has exactly acquaintances, which means that there are contestants knowing exactly , , , other contestants. Analogously, for , contestant knows and only them. This implies that he has exactly acquaintances, which means that there are contestants knowing exactly , , , other contestants.
Let us assume that there is a contestant, say , who knows other contestants and let those contestants make up a set . There must exist contestants who know exactly , , , other contestants.
We will say that the contestant has degree if he knows exactly other contestants.
Each element in has degree at most . Namely, he cannot know anyone from since there are no three contestants who all know each other (aside from and , there are only contestants).
We conclude that contestants from have at most distinct degrees. Simultaneously, there are contestants not in and different from , so they can have at most distinct degrees.
This shows that there are at most distinct degrees, and therefore it is impossible that there are contestants who know exactly , , , other contestants. Hence, there is no contestant who knows exactly other contestants.
Let us now show that is possible. Denote contestants as and call them A-contestants, and the remaining as and call them B-contestants.
For each and each , such that , let and be acquainted. All the other pairs of contestants are unfamiliar with each other. We claim that this example has , and that all the conditions of the problem are satisfied.
Namely, there are no three contestants who all know each other, because no two A-contestants know each other and no two B-contestants know each other.
Moreso, for , contestant knows contestants and only them. Hence, he has exactly acquaintances, which means that there are contestants knowing exactly , , , other contestants. Analogously, for , contestant knows and only them. This implies that he has exactly acquaintances, which means that there are contestants knowing exactly , , , other contestants.
Final answer
200
Techniques
Pigeonhole principleColoring schemes, extremal arguments