Browse · MathNet
PrintChina National Team Selection Test
China algebra
Problem
Given integer and real numbers in the interval , prove that there exist real numbers satisfying simultaneously the following conditions:
Solution
For any , define a sequence generated by as follows: ; for , if , and if .
Set . It is easy to show by induction that for every .
If there exists such that , consider the sequence generated by , . Clearly, this sequence satisfies the conditions (1) and (3). By the recursive relation, it also satisfies the condition (2). Thus, it suffices to show that there exists such that .
For any , we say that is a breaking point if at least one term in its generating sequence is . Since every breaking point is of the form , where , there are finitely many breaking points.
Clearly, is a breaking point; label all breaking points in increasing order by .
We first prove that for , for every .
Consider and their generating sequences. Assume that is the generating sequence of , and is the generating sequence of . Suppose that is the first term of equal to .
Construct a sequence as follows: It is clear that the sequence satisfies ; and for , if , and if .
We prove by induction that and .
The conclusion is obviously true for . Assume that it holds for . Then and , which implies that , , or , . In the former case, , , and thus . Similarly, in the latter case, we have .
If , then . Set , and consider the generating sequence of , . It is easy to show by induction that for any ( and both add or subtract for ; lies between and , so the recursive relation is the same). Then , i.e. is a breaking point — a contradiction to being two consecutive breaking points. Therefore, . By induction we have verified that and for all .
Since , , we have . It follows from the above argument that, for any , the generating sequence of has the same recursive relation as and , and hence Let us go back to the original problem.
If for some , we are done. If for some , then consider the generating sequence of , reversing every term after the first , and we obtain a new sequence , which satisfies the required conditions. Now assume that for every , and we shall consider two cases to show that for some :
Case 1: . Since , there exists such that , .
Since , we have , and hence . Again by , we have i.e. Let . Then , and and the result follows.
Case 2: . Since there is no breaking number in , we see from the previous argument that for any , the generating sequence of and the generating sequence of have the same recursive relation, and hence Since , we have , and hence Let . Then The result again follows.
Set . It is easy to show by induction that for every .
If there exists such that , consider the sequence generated by , . Clearly, this sequence satisfies the conditions (1) and (3). By the recursive relation, it also satisfies the condition (2). Thus, it suffices to show that there exists such that .
For any , we say that is a breaking point if at least one term in its generating sequence is . Since every breaking point is of the form , where , there are finitely many breaking points.
Clearly, is a breaking point; label all breaking points in increasing order by .
We first prove that for , for every .
Consider and their generating sequences. Assume that is the generating sequence of , and is the generating sequence of . Suppose that is the first term of equal to .
Construct a sequence as follows: It is clear that the sequence satisfies ; and for , if , and if .
We prove by induction that and .
The conclusion is obviously true for . Assume that it holds for . Then and , which implies that , , or , . In the former case, , , and thus . Similarly, in the latter case, we have .
If , then . Set , and consider the generating sequence of , . It is easy to show by induction that for any ( and both add or subtract for ; lies between and , so the recursive relation is the same). Then , i.e. is a breaking point — a contradiction to being two consecutive breaking points. Therefore, . By induction we have verified that and for all .
Since , , we have . It follows from the above argument that, for any , the generating sequence of has the same recursive relation as and , and hence Let us go back to the original problem.
If for some , we are done. If for some , then consider the generating sequence of , reversing every term after the first , and we obtain a new sequence , which satisfies the required conditions. Now assume that for every , and we shall consider two cases to show that for some :
Case 1: . Since , there exists such that , .
Since , we have , and hence . Again by , we have i.e. Let . Then , and and the result follows.
Case 2: . Since there is no breaking number in , we see from the previous argument that for any , the generating sequence of and the generating sequence of have the same recursive relation, and hence Since , we have , and hence Let . Then The result again follows.
Techniques
Existential quantifiersInduction / smoothingLinear and quadratic inequalities