Browse · MathNet
Print56th International Mathematical Olympiad Shortlisted Problems
counting and probability
Problem
Consider an infinite sequence of positive integers with for all . Suppose that for any two distinct indices and we have . Prove that there exist two positive integers and such that whenever .
Solution
We visualize the set of positive integers as a sequence of points. For each we draw an arrow emerging from that points to ; so the length of this arrow is . Due to the condition that for , each positive integer receives at most one arrow. There are some positive integers, such as 1, that receive no arrows; these will be referred to as starting points in the sequel. When one starts at any of the starting points and keeps following the arrows, one is led to an infinite path, called its ray, that visits a strictly increasing sequence of positive integers. Since the length of any arrow is at most 2015, such a ray, say with starting point , meets every interval of the form with at least once.
Suppose for the sake of contradiction that there would be at least 2016 starting points. Then we could take an integer that is larger than the first 2016 starting points. But now the interval must be met by at least 2016 rays in distinct points, which is absurd. We have thereby shown that the number of starting points satisfies . Let denote any integer that is larger than all starting points. We contend that and are as required.
To see this, let any two integers and with be given. The sum gives the total length of the arrows emerging from . Taken together, these arrows form subpaths of our rays, some of which may be empty. Now on each ray we look at the first number that is larger than ; let denote these numbers, and let enumerate in corresponding order the numbers defined similarly with respect to . Then the list of differences consists of the lengths of these paths and possibly some zeros corresponding to empty paths. Consequently, we obtain whence Now each of the rays meets the interval at some point and thus are distinct members of the set . Moreover, since is not a starting point, it must belong to some ray; so 1 has to appear among these numbers, wherefore The same argument applied to and yields So altogether we get as desired.
Solution 2:
Set for all positive integers . By our assumptions, we have for all . The members of the sequence are distinct. We shall investigate the set Claim. At most 2015 numbers belong to .
Proof. Otherwise let be any 2016 distinct elements from . For we have where on the left-hand side we have a disjoint union containing altogether elements. But the set on the right-hand side has only elements. This contradiction proves our claim.
Now we work towards proving that the positive integers and are as required. Recall that we have just shown .
Let us consider any integer . As in the proof of the above claim, we see that is a subset of with precisely elements. Due to the definitions of and , we also know . It follows that there is a set with and For any finite set of integers we denote the sum of its elements by . Now the equations (1) and (2) give rise to two ways of computing and the comparison of both methods leads to or in other words to After this preparation, we consider any two integers and with . Plugging and into (3) and subtracting the estimates that result, we deduce Since and are subsets of with , it is clear that the absolute value of the right-hand side of the above inequality attains its largest possible value if either and , or the other way around. In these two cases we have so in the general case we find as desired.
Suppose for the sake of contradiction that there would be at least 2016 starting points. Then we could take an integer that is larger than the first 2016 starting points. But now the interval must be met by at least 2016 rays in distinct points, which is absurd. We have thereby shown that the number of starting points satisfies . Let denote any integer that is larger than all starting points. We contend that and are as required.
To see this, let any two integers and with be given. The sum gives the total length of the arrows emerging from . Taken together, these arrows form subpaths of our rays, some of which may be empty. Now on each ray we look at the first number that is larger than ; let denote these numbers, and let enumerate in corresponding order the numbers defined similarly with respect to . Then the list of differences consists of the lengths of these paths and possibly some zeros corresponding to empty paths. Consequently, we obtain whence Now each of the rays meets the interval at some point and thus are distinct members of the set . Moreover, since is not a starting point, it must belong to some ray; so 1 has to appear among these numbers, wherefore The same argument applied to and yields So altogether we get as desired.
Solution 2:
Set for all positive integers . By our assumptions, we have for all . The members of the sequence are distinct. We shall investigate the set Claim. At most 2015 numbers belong to .
Proof. Otherwise let be any 2016 distinct elements from . For we have where on the left-hand side we have a disjoint union containing altogether elements. But the set on the right-hand side has only elements. This contradiction proves our claim.
Now we work towards proving that the positive integers and are as required. Recall that we have just shown .
Let us consider any integer . As in the proof of the above claim, we see that is a subset of with precisely elements. Due to the definitions of and , we also know . It follows that there is a set with and For any finite set of integers we denote the sum of its elements by . Now the equations (1) and (2) give rise to two ways of computing and the comparison of both methods leads to or in other words to After this preparation, we consider any two integers and with . Plugging and into (3) and subtracting the estimates that result, we deduce Since and are subsets of with , it is clear that the absolute value of the right-hand side of the above inequality attains its largest possible value if either and , or the other way around. In these two cases we have so in the general case we find as desired.
Techniques
Pigeonhole principleCounting two waysSums and products