Browse · MathNet
PrintJapan 2013 Final Round
Japan 2013 number theory
Problem
Let be an integer greater than or equal to . Find the smallest positive integer for which there exists a sequence of positive integers satisfying the following two conditions: . All of the numbers are perfect squares.
Solution
We will show that smallest possible value for is . If we let for , then we see that are all complete squares for each , and we have in this case. So, we will show that if there exists a sequence satisfying the two conditions of the problem, then must hold. To do this it is enough to show that holds for each . For this purpose, let us first show the following lemma.
Lemma. Let be a positive integer. Then, for any pair of positive integers , satisfying , the number is not a perfect square.
Proof. If and have different even-odd parity, then the assertion of the lemma is obvious since is not even an integer in this case. So, let us assume that and have the same even-odd parity. Then we see that the following inequalities hold: Since is an even number, the second inequality above can be sharpened to . Consequently, we have We can thus conclude that This shows that lies strictly in between two adjacent perfect squares, and therefore, it cannot be a perfect square, proving the assertion of the Lemma.
Let us now show the assertion that holds for each , using induction on . The assertion is obvious for . So, suppose is satisfied for a positive integer . If we have , then by taking and in the Lemma, we get a contradiction to the fact that is a perfect square. Thus we must have , completing the induction. Therefore, we have for each , and in particular, . This shows that the minimum value of we seek is .
Lemma. Let be a positive integer. Then, for any pair of positive integers , satisfying , the number is not a perfect square.
Proof. If and have different even-odd parity, then the assertion of the lemma is obvious since is not even an integer in this case. So, let us assume that and have the same even-odd parity. Then we see that the following inequalities hold: Since is an even number, the second inequality above can be sharpened to . Consequently, we have We can thus conclude that This shows that lies strictly in between two adjacent perfect squares, and therefore, it cannot be a perfect square, proving the assertion of the Lemma.
Let us now show the assertion that holds for each , using induction on . The assertion is obvious for . So, suppose is satisfied for a positive integer . If we have , then by taking and in the Lemma, we get a contradiction to the fact that is a perfect square. Thus we must have , completing the induction. Therefore, we have for each , and in particular, . This shows that the minimum value of we seek is .
Final answer
2n^2 - 1
Techniques
Techniques: modulo, size analysis, order analysis, inequalitiesIntegersLinear and quadratic inequalities