Browse · MathNet
PrintIRL_ABooklet_2023
Ireland 2023 number theory
Problem
The positive integers satisfy Assuming that each of the numbers is divisible by 7, prove that each of the numbers is divisible by 17.
Solution
Solution 1. First note that . If are divisible by 7, there are positive integers such that and the given conditions on translate into Multiplying (i) by and using (ii), we obtain Because , (i) implies that and . Since 17 is a prime number, we now see that both, and , must be divisible by 17. Knowing this, we can conclude from (i) that and
must also be divisible by 17. This means that and , hence . Using (iii) we now see that This implies that is divisible by 17, hence as required.
Solution 2. As we are allowed to assume are divisible by 7, then we can write . Dropping the primes, and noting the problem requires us to investigate solutions to: (i) (ii) (iii) . We are required to show that are all multiples of 17. It turns out the only relevant special properties of 17 are that it is an odd prime, so we make the following more general claim. Let be an odd prime and let be positive integers such that (i) (ii) (iii) . Then all of are multiples of . If we can prove this claim, the original problem is then solved by writing . Adding or subtracting twice criterion (ii) from criterion (iii) gives Using (i) to replace in the first equation by , and by in the second gives
Suppose for a contradiction that (without loss of generality given the symmetry of the equations) is not a multiple of . Then, as and are relatively prime, there is a residue such that and we have whence . It is clear that and so that and . Since and , it follows that neither nor are multiples of . Now recall . We cannot have both and as that would imply and hence , contradicting . So one of the factors must be divisible by . By swapping and if necessary, we may assume . Then we have . As , we can deduce that . Now are both positive integers so . But then we have , which is the required contradiction.
must also be divisible by 17. This means that and , hence . Using (iii) we now see that This implies that is divisible by 17, hence as required.
Solution 2. As we are allowed to assume are divisible by 7, then we can write . Dropping the primes, and noting the problem requires us to investigate solutions to: (i) (ii) (iii) . We are required to show that are all multiples of 17. It turns out the only relevant special properties of 17 are that it is an odd prime, so we make the following more general claim. Let be an odd prime and let be positive integers such that (i) (ii) (iii) . Then all of are multiples of . If we can prove this claim, the original problem is then solved by writing . Adding or subtracting twice criterion (ii) from criterion (iii) gives Using (i) to replace in the first equation by , and by in the second gives
Suppose for a contradiction that (without loss of generality given the symmetry of the equations) is not a multiple of . Then, as and are relatively prime, there is a residue such that and we have whence . It is clear that and so that and . Since and , it follows that neither nor are multiples of . Now recall . We cannot have both and as that would imply and hence , contradicting . So one of the factors must be divisible by . By swapping and if necessary, we may assume . Then we have . As , we can deduce that . Now are both positive integers so . But then we have , which is the required contradiction.
Techniques
Prime numbersFactorization techniquesInverses mod n