Browse · MathNet
PrintTeam Selection Test for IMO 2024
Turkey 2024 number theory
Problem
For an integer , let be the sum of all positive divisors of . A sequence of positive integers is defined as follows: and for each , is the smallest integer greater than 1 such that Determine the number of terms of this sequence dividing the number .
Solution
Answer: 36.
We will show that this sequence is increasing and consists of all the numbers of the form , where is a prime and is a non-negative integer. Thus, all the terms satisfying the condition are .
Let be the set of positive integers of the described form . We will use induction to prove that is the smallest number of . It is easy to verify that for the statement is correct. Assume that it is true for . Note that the smallest term in the set already satisfies the problem condition. We will consider two cases.
For the first case, assume that has only one prime divisor, say . If there are no other terms among the first that is not divisible by , then we must have by the minimality assumption. Otherwise, assume it is equal to for some . By the induction hypothesis, all the previous terms that are divisible by are for some . Then, since the function is multiplicative for relatively prime numbers we should only consider the powers of for the divisibility condition. Then, we must have which means hence . Which means, we must have since it is the smallest possible choice for and it satisfies the problem conditions. Note that in this case is in the set , it is a number that has not appeared before, and it is the minimal possible number in satisfying these conditions as claimed.
For the second case, assume that has at least two distinct prime divisors. Let . By the minimality condition, we can assume that has no prime divisors that is relatively prime to , because in that case that prime divisor itself would satisfy the condition and it is smaller than . Assume that the prime divisors of represented in the product be for and represented in the product be for . By the induction hypothesis, we have . Therefore, using the divisibility condition we have Since there are at least two primes, at least one of them are odd and both sides are even. Comparing the valuation of both sides and using the LTE Lemma, we have and therefore at least one index must satisfy and since we have non-negative powers this implies and . Then, choosing also satisfies the condition and it contradicts the minimality condition. Therefore, can not have two distinct prime divisors. We are done.
We will show that this sequence is increasing and consists of all the numbers of the form , where is a prime and is a non-negative integer. Thus, all the terms satisfying the condition are .
Let be the set of positive integers of the described form . We will use induction to prove that is the smallest number of . It is easy to verify that for the statement is correct. Assume that it is true for . Note that the smallest term in the set already satisfies the problem condition. We will consider two cases.
For the first case, assume that has only one prime divisor, say . If there are no other terms among the first that is not divisible by , then we must have by the minimality assumption. Otherwise, assume it is equal to for some . By the induction hypothesis, all the previous terms that are divisible by are for some . Then, since the function is multiplicative for relatively prime numbers we should only consider the powers of for the divisibility condition. Then, we must have which means hence . Which means, we must have since it is the smallest possible choice for and it satisfies the problem conditions. Note that in this case is in the set , it is a number that has not appeared before, and it is the minimal possible number in satisfying these conditions as claimed.
For the second case, assume that has at least two distinct prime divisors. Let . By the minimality condition, we can assume that has no prime divisors that is relatively prime to , because in that case that prime divisor itself would satisfy the condition and it is smaller than . Assume that the prime divisors of represented in the product be for and represented in the product be for . By the induction hypothesis, we have . Therefore, using the divisibility condition we have Since there are at least two primes, at least one of them are odd and both sides are even. Comparing the valuation of both sides and using the LTE Lemma, we have and therefore at least one index must satisfy and since we have non-negative powers this implies and . Then, choosing also satisfies the condition and it contradicts the minimality condition. Therefore, can not have two distinct prime divisors. We are done.
Final answer
36
Techniques
σ (sum of divisors)Prime numbersFactorization techniques