Browse · MathNet
PrintIMO 2019 Shortlisted Problems
2019 number theory
Problem
Let and be two positive integers. Prove that the integer is not a square. (Here denotes the least integer greater than or equal to .)
Solution
Assume, for contradiction, that Clearly, . In other words, the equation has a positive integer solution , with an even value of .
Choose a positive integer solution of (1) with minimal possible value of , without regard to the parity of . From and it can be seen that , so By substituting this in (1) we get and so Notice that relation (2) provides another positive integer solution of (1), namely and , with and . That contradicts the minimality of , and hence finishes the solution.
---
Alternative solution.
Suppose that with some positive integer , so Let , and ; then we have and , and (3) can be re-written as follows: So, by the indirect assumption, the equation (4) has some positive integer solution .
Fix and , and take a pair of positive integers, satisfying (4), such that is minimal. By the symmetry in (4) we may assume that .
Now we perform a usual "Vieta jump". Consider (4) as a quadratic equation in variable , and let be its second root. By the Vieta formulas, so The first formula shows that is an integer, and by the second formula is positive. Hence is another positive integer solution of (4). From we can see that and therefore . But this contradicts the minimality of among the positive integer solutions of (4).
Choose a positive integer solution of (1) with minimal possible value of , without regard to the parity of . From and it can be seen that , so By substituting this in (1) we get and so Notice that relation (2) provides another positive integer solution of (1), namely and , with and . That contradicts the minimality of , and hence finishes the solution.
---
Alternative solution.
Suppose that with some positive integer , so Let , and ; then we have and , and (3) can be re-written as follows: So, by the indirect assumption, the equation (4) has some positive integer solution .
Fix and , and take a pair of positive integers, satisfying (4), such that is minimal. By the symmetry in (4) we may assume that .
Now we perform a usual "Vieta jump". Consider (4) as a quadratic equation in variable , and let be its second root. By the Vieta formulas, so The first formula shows that is an integer, and by the second formula is positive. Hence is another positive integer solution of (4). From we can see that and therefore . But this contradicts the minimality of among the positive integer solutions of (4).
Techniques
Infinite descent / root flippingTechniques: modulo, size analysis, order analysis, inequalitiesVieta's formulas