Browse · MathNet
Print56th International Mathematical Olympiad Shortlisted Problems
algebra
Problem
Let be a fixed positive integer. Find the maximum possible value of where for all .
Solution
Let be the expression to be maximized. Since this expression is linear in every variable and , the maximum of will be achieved when or . Therefore, it suffices to consider only the case when for all . For , we introduce auxiliary variables Taking squares of both sides, we have where the last equality follows from the fact that . Notice that for every , the coefficient of in (1) is for each , and this coefficient is for each . This implies that the coefficient of in is . Therefore, summing (1) for yields Hence, it suffices to find the minimum of the left-hand side. Since , we see that is an even integer. In addition, , and so and are consecutive even integers for every . It follows that , which implies Combining (2) and (3), we get Hence, . If we set for odd indices and for even indices , then we obtain equality in (3) (and thus in (4)). Therefore, the maximum possible value of is , as desired.
---
Alternative solution.
We present a different method of obtaining the bound . As in the previous solution, we reduce the problem to the case . For brevity, we use the notation . Consider any . Let For any subsets and of we define One may observe that . Therefore, we have Thus, we need to maximize , where and form a partition of . Due to the symmetry, we may assume that and , where . From now on, we fix the value of and find an upper bound for in terms of and . Let and list all elements of and , respectively. Then and similarly Thus, now it suffices to maximize the value of In order to get an upper bound, we will apply the rearrangement inequality to the sequence (which is a permutation of ), together with the sequence of coefficients of these numbers in (8). The coefficients of form the sequence and those of form the sequence Altogether, these coefficients are, in descending order: - , for ; - , counted twice, for ; and , for . Thus, the rearrangement inequality yields Finally, combining the information from (5), (6), (7), and (9), we obtain which can be simplified to Since is a nonnegative integer, this yields .
---
Alternative solution.
We present a different method of obtaining the bound . As in the previous solution, we reduce the problem to the case . For brevity, we use the notation . Consider any . Let For any subsets and of we define One may observe that . Therefore, we have Thus, we need to maximize , where and form a partition of . Due to the symmetry, we may assume that and , where . From now on, we fix the value of and find an upper bound for in terms of and . Let and list all elements of and , respectively. Then and similarly Thus, now it suffices to maximize the value of In order to get an upper bound, we will apply the rearrangement inequality to the sequence (which is a permutation of ), together with the sequence of coefficients of these numbers in (8). The coefficients of form the sequence and those of form the sequence Altogether, these coefficients are, in descending order: - , for ; - , counted twice, for ; and , for . Thus, the rearrangement inequality yields Finally, combining the information from (5), (6), (7), and (9), we obtain which can be simplified to Since is a nonnegative integer, this yields .
Final answer
n(n-1)
Techniques
Combinatorial optimizationMuirhead / majorizationSums and products