Browse · MathNet
Print59th Ukrainian National Mathematical Olympiad
Ukraine number theory
Problem
Given two distinct natural numbers and greater than ,
a) Prove that there are infinitely many natural numbers such that is composite.
b) Prove that there are infinitely many prime numbers such that is divisible by for some .
a) Prove that there are infinitely many natural numbers such that is composite.
b) Prove that there are infinitely many prime numbers such that is divisible by for some .
Solution
a) If is prime for some larger than and , then for some and the numbers and are divisible by . If we set , then both and are divisible by for all natural numbers . This implies that the number is divisible by for all , which gives an infinite amount of composite members in the sequence of .
b) All prime divisors of either divide both and or none of them. Let be a common prime divisor of and , and and are the largest powers of that are divisors for and respectively. If then , and if then for all large enough . Therefore, for sufficiently large , the prime divisor raised to one of the powers or divides , implying that the greatest common divisor of and cannot be larger than , where – GCD of and . Let be a prime number dividing neither nor . Let be the largest power of that is divisor of (maybe, ). For some natural number both and are divisible by . Then, for some divisible by , the number is divisible by raised to the same power as . Now we can finally get back to the original problem. For the sake of contradiction, we assume that there are only finitely many primes dividing some . In particular, this means that there are only finitely many prime numbers which do not divide or , but divide for some . We have just shown that for all such there is such that for all divisible by , the largest number, such that raised to the power of this number is a divisor of, is smaller than the largest number, such that raised to the power of this number, is a divisor of . However, if we now choose divisible by all , then we will get that is not greater than . However, this cannot be the case for all because of the fact that one of or is bigger than .
b) All prime divisors of either divide both and or none of them. Let be a common prime divisor of and , and and are the largest powers of that are divisors for and respectively. If then , and if then for all large enough . Therefore, for sufficiently large , the prime divisor raised to one of the powers or divides , implying that the greatest common divisor of and cannot be larger than , where – GCD of and . Let be a prime number dividing neither nor . Let be the largest power of that is divisor of (maybe, ). For some natural number both and are divisible by . Then, for some divisible by , the number is divisible by raised to the same power as . Now we can finally get back to the original problem. For the sake of contradiction, we assume that there are only finitely many primes dividing some . In particular, this means that there are only finitely many prime numbers which do not divide or , but divide for some . We have just shown that for all such there is such that for all divisible by , the largest number, such that raised to the power of this number is a divisor of, is smaller than the largest number, such that raised to the power of this number, is a divisor of . However, if we now choose divisible by all , then we will get that is not greater than . However, this cannot be the case for all because of the fact that one of or is bigger than .
Techniques
Multiplicative orderFermat / Euler / Wilson theoremsGreatest common divisors (gcd)