Browse · MathNet
PrintIranian Mathematical Olympiad
Iran number theory
Problem
Prove that for each natural number , only a finite number of -tuples of consecutive natural numbers exist such that their product is a perfect square.
Solution
If is even, using the lemma proved in the solution of the 7th problem of the Third Round, we can say that there exist an integer and some polynomial such that Since is a perfect square for infinitely many values of , we get This is a contradiction since does not have any multiple roots.
For odd values of , we claim that if is a perfect square, there is some nonempty proper subset of such that is a perfect square. To prove the claim, consider all of the subsets of .
For any subset of , let be the product of elements of () and let be the square free part of .
Note that all of the prime divisors of are less than , because if some prime number divides two of the numbers , for example and , we obtain and hence . If for some divides only , this leads to a contradiction because is a perfect square, and the power of in the factorization of should be even.
For any , and so the prime divisors of all 's are less than . This implies that for each , is a divisor of . So we have cases for .
Since , . This implies that there are two subsets such that and (note that because ). Now, , therefore is a perfect square. We have Hence is a perfect square. But since , and this is the desired subset.
By replacing with if necessary, we will get a nonempty proper subset of with an even number of elements such that is a perfect square. Using the lemma in the solution of the 7th problem of the Third Round again, this product can be a perfect square for at most a finite number of values of . Thus if is odd, then is a perfect square for at most a finite number of values of .
For odd values of , we claim that if is a perfect square, there is some nonempty proper subset of such that is a perfect square. To prove the claim, consider all of the subsets of .
For any subset of , let be the product of elements of () and let be the square free part of .
Note that all of the prime divisors of are less than , because if some prime number divides two of the numbers , for example and , we obtain and hence . If for some divides only , this leads to a contradiction because is a perfect square, and the power of in the factorization of should be even.
For any , and so the prime divisors of all 's are less than . This implies that for each , is a divisor of . So we have cases for .
Since , . This implies that there are two subsets such that and (note that because ). Now, , therefore is a perfect square. We have Hence is a perfect square. But since , and this is the desired subset.
By replacing with if necessary, we will get a nonempty proper subset of with an even number of elements such that is a perfect square. Using the lemma in the solution of the 7th problem of the Third Round again, this product can be a perfect square for at most a finite number of values of . Thus if is odd, then is a perfect square for at most a finite number of values of .
Techniques
Prime numbersPigeonhole principlePolynomial operations