Skip to main content
OlympiadHQ

Browse · MathNet

Print

Selected Problems from Open Contests

Estonia number theory

Problem

Consider a positive integer with exactly 6 positive divisors such that . Call such an integer good if the sum is divisible by the sum .

a) Find the smallest positive integer which has exactly 6 positive divisors and which is not good.

b) Prove that there are infinitely many positive integers all with exactly 6 positive divisors and all not good.
Solution
a) Considering the numbers from 1 to 20 we see that exactly three of them have 6 divisors: 12 (the divisors are 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 12), 18 (1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 18), and 20 (1, 2, 4, 5, 10, 20). For 12 the sum is divisible by the sum and similarly, for 18 the sum is divisible by . However, for 20 the sum is not divisible by the sum . Thus, the smallest non-good number with exactly 6 factors is 20.

b) Take , where is an arbitrary prime number larger than 4. Then has exactly 6 different divisors: 1, 2, 4, , , , in increasing order. Indeed, as , where 2 and are two different prime numbers, all of its divisors can be expressed as where and . From here we obtain exactly choices: can be either 0, 1 or 2 and for every we have two choices for : 0 or 1. Here, is odd because and thus is not divisible by an even number . Therefore, none of the numbers expressed as where is a prime is good. As there are infinitely many prime numbers, there must also be infinitely many such numbers .

---

Alternative solution.

Let us find all which have exactly 6 divisors.

1) If , where is a prime, then it has the divisors 1, , ..., , i.e. divisors overall. Thus, all satisfy this requirement.

2) Let have two different prime divisors, i.e. . For and we see that has at least 9 different divisors: 1, , , , , , , , and . For , has the divisors 1, , ..., , and , , ..., , i.e. divisors in total. Thus, all satisfy the requirement.

3) Let have at least three prime divisors , , . Then has at least 8 different divisors: 1, , , , , , , and , and we get no more numbers.

Let us now consider and in more detail.

i) If , then and is divisible by . Thus they are all good.

ii) If , where , then has the divisors , and , in increasing order, and is divisible by and thus, they are all good, too.

iii) If , where , then has the divisors , and , in increasing order, and is divisible by . Thus, they are all good, too.

iv) Finally, let , where . Then has the divisors , and , in increasing order and is not divisible by because the prime number cannot be divisible by another prime number . Thus all these numbers have exactly 6 different divisors and they all are non-good. To get the smallest of these numbers, we have to take and as small as possible, i.e. and (to achieve ). Then . Finally, there are infinitely many of these numbers because we have infinitely many choices for prime numbers and such that . For example, we can take and an arbitrary prime number bigger than 5. As there are infinitely many prime numbers, we have proven the statement.
Final answer
a) 20. b) Infinitely many, for example all numbers of the form N = 4p with p a prime greater than 4 (more generally, all N = p^2 q with distinct primes p, q and q > p^2).

Techniques

τ (number of divisors)Factorization techniquesPrime numbers