Skip to main content
OlympiadHQ

Browse · MathNet

Print

Chinese Mathematical Olympiad

China counting and probability

Problem

There are some direct one-way flights among airports. Between any two airports and , there is at most one direct one-way flight from to (it is possible to have direct one-way flights both from to and from to ). Suppose that, for any set consisting of some airports with , there are at least flights in total departing from the airports in and arriving at the airports not in . Prove that for any airport , one can depart from and take no more than flights to return to .
Solution
Proof. We represent each airport with a point. If there is a one-way direct flight from airport a to airport b, we draw a directed edge , thus obtaining a directed graph G. Let , then . We will prove that for any vertex v, there exists a directed cycle passing through v with length at most . This will imply the desired proposition.

We prove by contradiction. Suppose that does not admit a directed cycle through of length less than or equal to . For each positive integer , set and set . We first prove the following fact:

(*) For , if the directed edge has source in and target in the complement , then and .

The proof of fact (*) is as follows: Clearly, . Otherwise, we could connect the directed path from to of length at most with the edge , obtaining a directed cycle passing through with length at most , which is a contradiction. Let (), then there exists a directed path from to of length . Connecting with the edge yields a directed path from to of length at most . Let be the length of the shortest directed path from to . Then . Since , we have , which implies and , i.e., and .

Next, we claim that: .

Proof of the claim: We prove by contradiction. Suppose that . For each , consider the set of all directed edges from to . On the one hand, the condition of the problem implies that On the other hand, (*) implies that for any directed edge in , we have and . From this we know that the number of directed edges in is less than or equal to the ordered pairs , i.e. Combining these two discussions, we deduce that, for any , we have Put . From the given conditions, we see that . Using (*), we know that all directed edges from to its complement all satisfy . In particular, . So . Similarly to (*), one can prove all directed edges from to its complement satisfy .

So we have We deduce from this that Thus, we have .

Based on this, we use induction to prove that, for , we have . Suppose that for some , we have and . Using (1), we know that, for , we have . Thus, we have This completes the inductive proof and therefore, , contradicting with earlier assumption ! This proves the claim.

Similarly, define , and the shortest directed path from to has length and put . Symmetrically, one can prove that .

Finally, note that both and are subsets of and we have and . So the intersection of and is nonempty. Take , then there is a directed path from to of length and there is a directed path from to of length . Combining these two gives a directed cycle through of length less than or equal to . Contradiction! □

Techniques

Graph TheoryCounting two waysInduction / smoothingQM-AM-GM-HM / Power Mean