Skip to main content
OlympiadHQ

Browse · MathNet

Print

Chinese Mathematical Olympiad

China number theory

Problem

Determine the smallest real number with the following property: every positive integer can be written as a product , with each either a prime number or a positive integer that is less than or equal to .
Solution
The number is . The minimal such is . To see that does not work, we take for some prime number . Then when writing as the product of integers, at least one of the integers is for some (which is not a prime number); then . Now we prove that satisfies the condition of the problem. To start, we write as the product of its prime factors (allowing some 's to be equal), where we order the primes so that . Now starting from , let be the smallest integer such that . Note that this satisfies the condition of the problem, namely, if , is a prime number; otherwise , then we must have . This means that ; so where the first inequality holds by minimality of . Next, let be the smallest integer such that . The same argument as above shows that either is a prime number or . Continue this process. If we run out of 's before reaching , then set the rest of to be , and then gives the needed decomposition. Otherwise, we have constructed satisfying the condition of the problem (and that each by construction), then we must have The decomposition satisfies the conditions of the problem.

---

Alternative solution.

The proof for that does not work is the same as Solution 1. We prove that satisfies the requirement. Let be the prime factorization of (where ). For , define Then and . If , then let be plus ones. If , since , suppose , then . For , we have Let be and ones.

---

Alternative solution.

The proof for that does not work is the same as Solution 1. We prove that satisfies the requirement. Express as such that

is minimized. (Since there are a finite number of ways to express this, such a representation must exist.) Next, we prove that every greater than is a prime number. We use proof by contradiction. Suppose and is not a prime number. Let where and , and without loss of generality, assume . Since there exists an . Assume without loss of generality that . Express as . Since the expression is not the one that minimizes , which is a contradiction! Therefore, satisfies the problem's conditions.

---

Alternative solution.

The proof for that does not work is the same as Solution 1. We prove that satisfies the requirement. Let , where are all the prime factors of . If , then express as the product of and ones. If , first express as . Then, perform the following operation: in each step, select the smallest two factors and combine them into their product, continue this process until only factors remain. In each step, as the current number of factors is , the product of the smallest two numbers will be . This indicates that every "composite" number formed after each operation is . Combining this with the fact that the initial numbers are primes, it can be concluded that when the operation ends, the factors are either prime or do not exceed . Hence, satisfies the conditions of the problem.
Final answer
1/1012

Techniques

Prime numbersFactorization techniquesQM-AM-GM-HM / Power MeanColoring schemes, extremal argumentsInduction / smoothing