Browse · MathNet
PrintIranian Mathematical Olympiad
Iran number theory
Problem
Let be a real number and a strictly increasing sequence of positive integers such that for every , . A prime number is called golden if there is a positive integer such that . Suppose that are all golden prime numbers. a) Prove that if , then .
b) Prove that if , then .
b) Prove that if , then .
Solution
a) Denote by the number of golden prime numbers less than or equal to . We want to show that . Suppose that is collection of all natural numbers less than or equal to with prime factors from the set . Obviously each element of can be written in the form where and is out of square. So and such that . Therefore and have and states respectively, and so .
On the other hand for each integer we have And all prime divisors of are in the set , so (). Therefore has at least elements. So , But it is easy to check that and this implies , because .
b) The proof of this part is very similar to part a. Denote by the number of golden prime numbers less than or equal to . We want to show that . Suppose that is collection of all natural numbers less than or equal to with prime factors from the set . Then every element of can be written in the form where and are out of square. (In part a writing as where and is out of square implies this claim.) Now , and such that . Thus we have and states for and respectively and so .
In this case if () then (). Although prime divisors of () are in the set so , hence . On the other hand and so which implies .
On the other hand for each integer we have And all prime divisors of are in the set , so (). Therefore has at least elements. So , But it is easy to check that and this implies , because .
b) The proof of this part is very similar to part a. Denote by the number of golden prime numbers less than or equal to . We want to show that . Suppose that is collection of all natural numbers less than or equal to with prime factors from the set . Then every element of can be written in the form where and are out of square. (In part a writing as where and is out of square implies this claim.) Now , and such that . Thus we have and states for and respectively and so .
In this case if () then (). Although prime divisors of () are in the set so , hence . On the other hand and so which implies .
Techniques
Prime numbersFactorization techniquesCounting two ways