Browse · MathNet
Print63rd Czech and Slovak Mathematical Olympiad
Czech Republic algebra
Problem
Let , be non-negative real numbers. Prove the inequality and find when the equality holds.
Solution
It is evident that the inequality under consideration becomes an equality when , or . To prove that otherwise the strong inequality holds, it suffices to deal with the case and (after removing the fractions) to show that Distributing the right-hand side and regrouping the terms we get Multiplying the differences of the square roots by their sums as the denominators of new installed fractions, we obtain Dividing both sides by the positive number and removing the fractions again, we finally arrive at an equivalent inequality which easily follows by an easy comparison of the both sides "term by term" (because our assumption implies that ). This completes the proof of the given inequality. As we have shown, the only cases of the equality are , and .
Another solution: We exclude the cases and (when the inequality becomes an equality) from our considerations. Let us apply a Cauchy-Schwarz inequality in the form with positive coefficients and : Another Cauchy-Schwarz inequality yields an upper bound for the second factor from the-left hand side of (1): Consequently, the first factor in (1) has a lower bound which is the desired inequality. Since (1) becomes an equality if and only if the positive coefficients and are the same, i.e. in our situation, the equality is the third (and last) case (next to and from the introductory sentence) when the proven inequality holds as an equality.
Another solution: Let us exclude the obvious cases and let us transform the (strong) inequality under consideration into the following equivalent form: The last left-hand side can be read as that of the (strong) Jensen inequality with positive coefficients and (which satisfy as required), applied to the function at the points and . Since the function is strictly convex on the interval and since the points and are assumed to be distinct, the Jensen inequality (3) holds. It remains to verify that also the right-hand sides of (2) and (3) are identical. This is easy:
Another solution: We exclude the cases and (when the inequality becomes an equality) from our considerations. Let us apply a Cauchy-Schwarz inequality in the form with positive coefficients and : Another Cauchy-Schwarz inequality yields an upper bound for the second factor from the-left hand side of (1): Consequently, the first factor in (1) has a lower bound which is the desired inequality. Since (1) becomes an equality if and only if the positive coefficients and are the same, i.e. in our situation, the equality is the third (and last) case (next to and from the introductory sentence) when the proven inequality holds as an equality.
Another solution: Let us exclude the obvious cases and let us transform the (strong) inequality under consideration into the following equivalent form: The last left-hand side can be read as that of the (strong) Jensen inequality with positive coefficients and (which satisfy as required), applied to the function at the points and . Since the function is strictly convex on the interval and since the points and are assumed to be distinct, the Jensen inequality (3) holds. It remains to verify that also the right-hand sides of (2) and (3) are identical. This is easy:
Final answer
Equality holds if and only if one of the numbers is zero or the two numbers are equal.
Techniques
Cauchy-SchwarzJensen / smoothing