Skip to main content
OlympiadHQ

Browse · MathNet

Print

48th International Mathematical Olympiad Vietnam 2007 Shortlisted Problems with Solutions

2007 geometry

Problem

Determine the smallest positive real number with the following property. Let be a convex quadrilateral, and let points and lie on sides , and , respectively. Consider the areas of triangles , and ; let be the sum of the two smallest ones, and let be the area of quadrilateral . Then we always have .

problem


problem


problem


problem


problem
Solution
Throughout the solution, triangles , and will be referred to as border triangles. We will denote by the area of a region .

First, we show that . Consider a triangle with unit area; let be the midpoints of its sides , respectively. Choose a point on the extension of , close to . Take points and on sides and close to (see Figure 1). We have . Moreover, as , we get , , and . Hence, the sum of the two smallest areas of border triangles tends to , as well as ; therefore, their ratio tends to , and .

We are left to prove that satisfies the desired property.

Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3

Lemma. Let points lie respectively on sides of a triangle . Then .

Proof. Let be the midpoints of sides and , respectively.

Suppose that two of points lie in one of triangles , , and . (For convenience, let points and lie in triangle ; see Figure 2.) Let segments and intersect at point . Then also lies in triangle . Hence , and we have as required.

Otherwise, each one of triangles , , contains exactly one of points , , , and we can assume that , , (see Figure 3). Then lines and intersect at a point on the extension of beyond point , hence ; also, lines and intersect at a point on the extension of beyond point , hence . Finally, since , we have .

Now, from we obtain that one of the remaining triangles has an area less than , so it is less than .

Now we return to the problem. We say that triangle is small if is less than each of and ; otherwise this triangle is big (the similar notion is introduced for triangles ). If both triangles and are big, then is not less than the area of some border triangle, and is not less than the area of another one; hence, . The same is valid for the pair of and . So it is sufficient to prove that in one of these pairs both triangles are big.

Suppose the contrary. Then there is a small triangle in each pair. Without loss of generality, assume that triangles and are small. We can assume also that . Note that in this case ray intersects line .

Consider two cases.

Figure 4 Figure 5

Case 1. Ray intersects line at some point . Let ray intersect line at point (see Figure 4). Then we have , (both - since is small), and (since triangle is small). This contradicts the Lemma, applied for triangle inside .

Case 2. Ray does not intersect . Then choose a "sufficiently far" point on ray such that , and that ray intersects line at some point (see Figure 5). Since ray does not intersect line , the points and are on different sides of ; then and are also on different sides, and is on the same side as and . Then analogously we have and since triangle is small. This (together with ) contradicts the Lemma again.
Final answer
1

Techniques

Optimization in geometryTrigonometryConstructions and loci