Browse · MathNet
PrintRomanian Master of Mathematics
Romania algebra
Problem
Let be the set of all positive integers. A subset of is sum-free if, whenever and are (not necessarily distinct) members of , their sum does not belong to . Determine all surjective functions such that, for each sum-free subset of , the image is again sum-free. India, Sutanay Bhattacharya
Solution
The identity is the only surjection of the positive integers onto themselves sending every sum-free set onto a sum-free set (no verification is needed, of course). To prove this, fix a function satisfying the conditions in the statement, and proceed in several steps.
Step 1. Notice that a 2-element set , where , is not sum-free if and only if .
Choose any , and for any choose some such that . The set is not sum-free, so neither is , whence or . Since the are all distinct, the same option should hold for all . The former option yields which cannot hold for large enough . So for all . Therefore, for all , and, moreover, is the only argument with . Therefore, is injective (and hence bijective).
Step 2. Say that a 3-element set is good if it is not sum-free, but each of its 2-element subsets is (in other words, no element is twice another). It is easily seen that a set , where , is good only if . Notice that the pre-image of a good set is also a good set, due to Step 1. Now let . We show that by induction on . The base cases are ; for the result follows from Step 1. Set and . The sets and are good, hence so are and . Therefore, . But the set is also good, so the pair is contained in one more good set, which is not the case if , since is contained in one single good set, namely, . Thus and , which establishes the base. For the induction step, assume that for all , where . Choose . Then the pair is contained in two good sets, namely, and . Their pre-images, and , are also good, and injectivity of forces . This completes the induction step. Finally, since is surjective, for some positive integer , so . Consequently, is the identity, as claimed at the beginning of the solution.
---
Alternative solution.
The approach is similar to Solution 1, but avoids directly defining and working with good sets. Step 1 in Solution 1 is proved similarly. For any odd integer , we claim is equal to one of and . Indeed, its preimage should, together with and , form a set that is not sum-free. contradicts injectivity, as does , hence or .
, contradicting injectivity. Therefore, for all odd integers . Finally, we prove by induction. Indeed, assume the statements holds for all integers up to some even . The base case for holds by Step 1 of Solution 1. Then, by assumption, implying and, by the above result, completing the induction.
Assume that for some odd integer . Inducting backwards, we see the statement holds for all odd integers up to , in particular
The conclusion now follows as in Solution 1.
Step 1. Notice that a 2-element set , where , is not sum-free if and only if .
Choose any , and for any choose some such that . The set is not sum-free, so neither is , whence or . Since the are all distinct, the same option should hold for all . The former option yields which cannot hold for large enough . So for all . Therefore, for all , and, moreover, is the only argument with . Therefore, is injective (and hence bijective).
Step 2. Say that a 3-element set is good if it is not sum-free, but each of its 2-element subsets is (in other words, no element is twice another). It is easily seen that a set , where , is good only if . Notice that the pre-image of a good set is also a good set, due to Step 1. Now let . We show that by induction on . The base cases are ; for the result follows from Step 1. Set and . The sets and are good, hence so are and . Therefore, . But the set is also good, so the pair is contained in one more good set, which is not the case if , since is contained in one single good set, namely, . Thus and , which establishes the base. For the induction step, assume that for all , where . Choose . Then the pair is contained in two good sets, namely, and . Their pre-images, and , are also good, and injectivity of forces . This completes the induction step. Finally, since is surjective, for some positive integer , so . Consequently, is the identity, as claimed at the beginning of the solution.
---
Alternative solution.
The approach is similar to Solution 1, but avoids directly defining and working with good sets. Step 1 in Solution 1 is proved similarly. For any odd integer , we claim is equal to one of and . Indeed, its preimage should, together with and , form a set that is not sum-free. contradicts injectivity, as does , hence or .
, contradicting injectivity. Therefore, for all odd integers . Finally, we prove by induction. Indeed, assume the statements holds for all integers up to some even . The base case for holds by Step 1 of Solution 1. Then, by assumption, implying and, by the above result, completing the induction.
Assume that for some odd integer . Inducting backwards, we see the statement holds for all odd integers up to , in particular
The conclusion now follows as in Solution 1.
Final answer
f(n) = n for all n in N
Techniques
Injectivity / surjectivityOtherOther